Org, your older play would net you a solid C. The more recent stuff will means a B. Para was A but ExKirby plopped you with a prod. Mafia-active means being there in the QuickTopic, at least so the others know what your up to.
Thus you're at a low B.
@Vector
I was pondering the idea of + and -. The problem is quantifying it. I want an Objective system, to the point where even if a person who abuses systems gets access they'll either have to change/break the rules or be stuck being honest. That said, it needs more fine tuning AND specifics in just what each rank does.
You did show a quirk though: your recent situation should not be an A or a D. Probably B: you do ask for replacements but you don't need to be prodded. Perhaps we can use your situation to balance the system.
A+ : Receive an A rank then Substitute for someone in a game
A : 1 prod max per quarter, No Substitutions
B + : 1 prod max per quarter, 2 or less Substitutions
B : 3 prods max per quarter, no more than 1 prod per game. Substitutes by request only - 2 max
C : One of these: 3+ prods in a quarter / more than 1 prod in a game / more than 2 requested Subs
D : Two or more of these: +3 prods in a quarter / more than 1 prod in a game / more than 2 sub requests.
E : 1 or more forced Substitutions
In all but E, you can get a minus if you qualified to get into a lower rank but have a specific explanation for the cause. I.e. your vacation, Vector, would mean you qualify for a C rank but should be B-. I'm also thinking that someone who subs-in once a quarter should go up whatever their Rank: C to C+, B+ to A-, ext. We are in bad need of more people willing to Sub for someone.