There's a viewpoint that the sheer number of choices that we are required to make has lead to "analysis paralysis". Basically, some choice is good, but after a certain point the sheer weight of choices just causes meltdown, leading to disengagement or depression.
with e.g. 6 choices you can comfortably feel like you chose well, and if none of the choices were that great: it's not your fault, because those were the only ones available. But when "choice" expands to hundreds of choices, you can't process that amount of information, and if you chose bad, then it is your fault, leading to feelings of guilt, because there was always the possibility of one of the other hundreds of choices being way better. When there are too many choices, the perceived negatives of the one you did choose become much more pronounced. This extends to all areas of life. Over-choice actually decreases happiness. Lab certified fact.
But in the current situation we're being asked to make choices from a much more vast tableau of choices, and about things that are much more central to who we are - "you can be who you want to be" is a catchy slogan, but could be a double-edged sword. It could be read as "your family and society is going to abrogate it's responsibility for helping you sort out why we put you on this planet, you're on your own sucker. Not our fault (except that it is since we put you here without a choice)".
So we can "be whoever we want to be". On top of all the choices we're forced to make (much more than previous generations, who had life basically mapped out for them, including getting married, jobs for life), we can't even be sure of who we are. In terms of choice theory, and how people become much more depressed when there are lots of choices (even when the quality of the choices goes up as a result), things like tumblr micro-genders could actually be more constraining than just having some broad-strokes gender definitions and sexual orientations.