Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[LeoLeonardoIII]

Good gods people, it's been something like a post a minute for the last half hour in here >_<

My singing sounds the same pitch, and does not change. Again, monotonous.

It might be worth it to look into some of the musical styles that don't involve vibrato and whatnot. Some stuff is intended to be monotone, or something pretty similar to it, and can still sound pretty nice. Tunak tunak tun is, I think, (close to?) an example.

From what I understand, you might start looking in the middle eastern or heavily islam-influenced areas.

Gregorian chant. Plus it acts as a Sleep spell in certain situations.

[Gunner-Chan]

One hundred ten...

You mean there's someone on this board, and a dude at that. That I weigh twice as much as? Is this a bad thing for me or a bad thing for him?

[LeoLeonardoIII]

It means if you were trying to get into Arstotzka wearing his face and a trenchcoat, you would need to stand on someone's shoulders who was exactly as heavy as you.

[TD1]

Good gods people, it's been something like a post a minute for the last half hour in here >_<

My singing sounds the same pitch, and does not change. Again, monotonous.

It might be worth it to look into some of the musical styles that don't involve vibrato and whatnot. Some stuff is intended to be monotone, or something pretty similar to it, and can still sound pretty nice. Tunak tunak tun is, I think, (close to?) an example.

From what I understand, you might start looking in the middle eastern or heavily islam-influenced areas.

Gregorian chant. Plus it acts as a Sleep spell in certain situations.

No thanks 

I like lively music. And skillful as it may be, Georgian Chant is not for me.

[BlackFlyme]

One hundred ten...

You mean there's someone on this board, and a dude at that. That I weigh twice as much as? Is this a bad thing for me or a bad thing for him?

People come in all shapes and sizes.

I don't even break 100 myself.

E: Rephrased.

[Owlga]

It means if you were trying to get into Arstotzka wearing his face and a trenchcoat, you would need to stand on someone's shoulders who was exactly as heavy as you.

So you're saying, For janet to disguse herself as MrWillSauce, she needs to get his face, a trenchcoat, sit on someones shoulders and likely break 8 feet in height, while sitting on another person weighing 220 lbs and then be a 8-9 foot tall super skinny trenchcoat wearing monster with a 17 year old mans bleeding sawn off face strapped to her head. Into a booth that likely wont even fit her and her accomplice now.

[Talvieno]

Things that made you happy today: this thread and the lols. For many were had. Gotta love irony.

Honestly, though, today has not been a good day for me. This is a high point.

[LeoLeonardoIII]

It means if you were trying to get into Arstotzka wearing his face and a trenchcoat, you would need to stand on someone's shoulders who was exactly as heavy as you.

So you're saying, For janet to disguse herself as MrWillSauce, she needs to get his face, a trenchcoat, sit on someones shoulders and likely break 8 feet in height, while sitting on another person weighing 220 lbs and then be a 8-9 foot tall super skinny trenchcoat wearing monster with a 17 year old mans bleeding sawn off face strapped to her head. Into a booth that likely wont even fit her and her accomplice now.

I don't think it's quite as bad as you make it sound.

For one thing, the person on the bottom doesn't get his full height, he's missing the height from his head which overlaps the height of the person on top. Also, the person on top doesn't count any of their leg length. Effectively the bottom person loses 1/8 of their height, and the person on top loses 1/2 theirs. Assuming both are about 5' tall,

Bottom: 5 x 7/8 = 4.375
Top: 5 x 1/2 = 2.5
Total: 6.875

This would probably be taller than the original person, sure. But you can do a lot by having the bottom person hunch over and bend his legs, and the top person slide back a bit farther on his shoulders and also hunch over a bit. But if they straightened up they would look a bit like a looming stilt-walker.

[MaximumZero]

It means if you were trying to get into Arstotzka wearing his face and a trenchcoat, you would need to stand on someone's shoulders who was exactly as heavy as you.

So you're saying, For janet to disguse herself as MrWillSauce, she needs to get his face, a trenchcoat, sit on someones shoulders and likely break 8 feet in height, while sitting on another person weighing 220 lbs and then be a 8-9 foot tall super skinny trenchcoat wearing monster with a 17 year old mans bleeding sawn off face strapped to her head. Into a booth that likely wont even fit her and her accomplice now.

I don't think it's quite as bad as you make it sound.

For one thing, the person on the bottom doesn't get his full height, he's missing the height from his head which overlaps the height of the person on top. Also, the person on top doesn't count any of their leg length. Effectively the bottom person loses 1/8 of their height, and the person on top loses 1/2 theirs. Assuming both are about 5' tall,

Bottom: 5 x 7/8 = 4.375
Top: 5 x 1/2 = 2.5
Total: 6.875

This would probably be taller than the original person, sure. But you can do a lot by having the bottom person hunch over and bend his legs, and the top person slide back a bit farther on his shoulders and also hunch over a bit. But if they straightened up they would look a bit like a looming stilt-walker.

Janet+Janet would be 8 1/2 feet tall. And that's terrifying.

[LeoLeonardoIII]

It means if you were trying to get into Arstotzka wearing his face and a trenchcoat, you would need to stand on someone's shoulders who was exactly as heavy as you.

So you're saying, For janet to disguse herself as MrWillSauce, she needs to get his face, a trenchcoat, sit on someones shoulders and likely break 8 feet in height, while sitting on another person weighing 220 lbs and then be a 8-9 foot tall super skinny trenchcoat wearing monster with a 17 year old mans bleeding sawn off face strapped to her head. Into a booth that likely wont even fit her and her accomplice now.

I don't think it's quite as bad as you make it sound.

For one thing, the person on the bottom doesn't get his full height, he's missing the height from his head which overlaps the height of the person on top. Also, the person on top doesn't count any of their leg length. Effectively the bottom person loses 1/8 of their height, and the person on top loses 1/2 theirs. Assuming both are about 5' tall,

Bottom: 5 x 7/8 = 4.375
Top: 5 x 1/2 = 2.5
Total: 6.875

This would probably be taller than the original person, sure. But you can do a lot by having the bottom person hunch over and bend his legs, and the top person slide back a bit farther on his shoulders and also hunch over a bit. But if they straightened up they would look a bit like a looming stilt-walker.

Janet+Janet would be 8 1/2 feet tall. And that's terrifying.

I'm just happy to see a picture of Jackie Chan having mental confusion.

[BlackFlyme]

For some reason I've now got this stuck in my head, even though it's three people, not two.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)

[Owlga]

Janet+Janet would be 8 1/2 feet tall. And that's terrifying.

Janet + Janet would be more like 3 feet tall at most. Because fuck going human totem pole, I know both Janet and Janet clone would be too busy doing herself(s).

[LeoLeonardoIII]

Look, there's a point when you're done with all that for the moment and you really just need to get into Arstotzka.

[MrWillsauce]

a 17 year old man

Goddamn right I am.

[MaximumZero]

Janet+Janet would be 8 1/2 feet tall. And that's terrifying.

Janet + Janet would be more like 3 feet tall at most. Because fuck going human totem pole, I know both Janet and Janet clone would be too busy doing herself(s).

That's fair enough.