My point with the anthill is to ask, why does there need to be a "single" consciousness at all? That's pretty much only basing this idea of a single entity "God" on ourselves. And it's arrogant to say that the way we "just happen" to operate as evolved entities, is ALSO the way "the creator of the universe" operates.
Anyway, why even a consciousness at all? Why limit the universe's potential by the model of our own existence, since we're a fairly insignificant randomly-created thing. "Consciousness" is something we only really know about from OURSELVES. To state the entirety of everything, ever, works on our personal species principle is very arrogant.
Why does the have to be a "mind" behind anything at all? Pretty much humans are very good at anthropomorphizing - probably due to our evolution as a social creature we project the idea of consciousness onto everything and everyone so we can better judge their future behavior. It works well for other humans, but not so well for inanimate objects. We see a "mind" in everything - volcanoes, trees, rocks, the wind, the moon, the sun, the stars, the Earth itself. We we wrong about there being a mind inside all those other things - i don't see any reason to give the benefit of the doubt to people who say "well we can't say for sure, so there's definitely a Mind behind the universe itself!".