So I suppose making personal attacks against other forumites is fine then.
And I really think you need to come up with a new simile, the twitter one's been done to death.
"An Internet forum, or message board, is an online discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages.[1] They differ from chat rooms in that messages are at least temporarily archived. Also, depending on the access level of a user and/or the forum set-up, a posted message might need to be approved by a moderator before it becomes visible."
Oh, now... conversations, that sounds awfully like forums are made for *gasp* conversing!! I wasn't aware that that was restricted solely to "let us talk about this one topic and not discuss anything that may be mildly unrelated to the forum"
Well, that's not really what my post was about, but sure, let me bring up the same argument I've presented over and over before.
While he could easily have been a lot more polite and civil, Dasleah was effectively saying the same things I've said (and continue to say) about the forums. Despite what Wikipedia says I maintain that stuff like "I'm feeling lurkingly today" or "I am on fire!" "Burn, baby, burn!" doesn't count as discussion (in a subforum marked General Discussion, no less) and frankly doesn't count as conversation either in my book. Not that it doesn't have a place - but it's not on a forum. When you make a post you're expected to put a bit of thought into it. That's what differentiates it from IRC, which is much more transient, and a lot better suited (read: suited at all) for the kind of 'conversations' you guys are always having. Do I babble and go on random dead end tangents unrelated to anything sometimes? Sure. Do I do it on the forums? No. I do it on IRC, because it goes with the communication form. The reason I keep bringing up the Twitter analogy is because it's an apt comparison: Most of the posts in the Things threads are contentless and don't provoke any discussion. It's just posting for the sake of posting, really. Which is dumb.
In terms of what Dasleah was saying, I still think it's ridiculous how Janet lords over her thread effectively just because she can. Due to what honestly wasn't even an out of line conversation in the first place she got a panic attack or something and decided to lock the Happy thread... just because. When Dasleah called her out on it a whole crowd of you jumped in with NO SHE'S RIGHT even though the 'inciting incident' was entirely unrelated to the 'punishment,' and when she admitted that she didn't really have a reason to do so the same people patted her on the back and told her not to worry about it. And
none of you who were initially saying Janet was completely and totally in the right to randomly lock a thread on impulse were willing to actually say "huh, well if she thinks she might have been wrong, maybe we
were just jumping in to her defense for the sake of it." Mindmaker ended up being the only one who thought "DISCUSSION FUCKING OVER, STOP TALKING ABOUT IT" was a damned rude way of getting people to shut up about a topic just because you don't like it, and he got ignored because nobody was willing to actually have a real debate on the matter.
Honestly, I'd have been much happier to get in on the Oh No Forum Drama while it was still hot and back Mindmaker up myself, but Toady gets mad any time too many IRC b12ers are posting in any one topic at a given time, and as Nagash was already responding I figured I'd stay out or we'd both get banned for 'dogpiling' (this isn't an exaggeration, either). So I guess I'll chime in now: I don't think arbitrarily locking a thread due to a knee-jerk panic response is at all a responsible thing to do, I think it's absurd that so many people ignore how often it happens or the lack of rationale for doing (in some cases even giving her positive support for it?), and I think it's sadly hilarious that people like Something Evil can say things like "You locked a thread just to see what kind of influence you wield over the forums. All in all a pretty good outcome!" with a straight face and not see what's wrong with that sentence. But who knows? Between you and her I feel like I'm the only person
not locking threads due to personal whims or sudden emotional fits.
And for the record, since this tends to come up among the clutter of people who use this as a response to any debate or argument, having a different opinion than your own does
not make somebody a troll, and "THE DISCUSSION IS FUCKING OVER" is effectively a crude way of saying that you'd prefer to exist in a happy state of denial instead of form a counterpoint.
But let's get on topic! It's 9:40 am, I'm exhausted and out of coffee, and I'm gonna scurry off for a schnooze before working on an essay later. I'll respond to anything then.