No-- It is superficial platitude, by raw definition. It is superficial, because it is only at the surface-- not what the person really feels or believes. It is a platitude, because it is intended to make somebody feel better.
I dont get off on making people feel bad. That is a genuine statement. However, if I inadvertently piss somebody off, I would like to know why and how it pissed them off. It helps me understand them better.
You seem to be misunderstanding me here. I wont change my core being for somebody, or act in a way contrary to my core being, but I am willing to refrain from using certain language or from discussing certain subjects if it genuinely distresses somebody. Personally, I feel that doing so is a platitude, but if the person GENUINELY NEEDS that platitude, I will indulge them, but only when I know they need it. I dont reach for the fake front as the first option, and I prefer not to deal with people that need such fronts.
(EG, if somebody has had PTSD, and it makes them genuinely flip out to discuss war, I wont discuss war with that person. The restriction makes me uncomfortable, and I would prefer speaking with other people without the issue. I lament that the person has PTSD, and cannot discuss the subject without freaking out, and I would not wish to cause the person to freak out if they are in earshot, so if they are, I wont discuss the topic. That does not mean I am going to pretend that everyone has PTSD though-- I am not going to pretend that war isnt a horrible bloody mess, and that the world is some happy place filled with warm fuzzies, and I am not going to tell the person with PTSD that the world is a happy place. I will just refrain from triggering their anxiety and other mental issues concerning war.)
In short, I dont coddle. I will abstain from pouring salt in wounds, but I dont coddle.