I know some semblance of the feeling, at least. I've always worked extremely differently from those around me. People talk about studying for hours and hours each night, avoiding cramming, but in retrospect, that's never worked for me. The only "studying" I've ever done is busywork, and that's only been helpful where there's bits of routine that they never taught us to really understand on a deep level (because doing so would be an entire high-level course, and we've got one week to cover it, so they just give you the end result to use as a tool). I hated doing that so much, I just couldn't force myself to keep plowing through it for more than 20 or 30 minutes. It's responsible for a lot of the grades I could've got but never did. I mean, flash cards? Fuck, no. Stuff like that hurts, on some level.
When dealing with stuff that I actually had a chance of understanding, though. Totally different. I didn't have to spend hours going over it, because hearing the lecture, looking at the data, playing with the concepts in my head... I'd get it the first time around, basically. When I didn't, repetition didn't help, I had to come from a different angle or I'd just hit a brick wall. I didn't just have to memorize a fact, I could fit something into a web of thought that let me build up the answers I'd need later on, on the fly. If that makes sense. It's hard to put into words, but it's the difference between "Acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s/s" and the Law of Gravitation. Even in classes that are usually thought of as mostly memorization (anatomy, history, etc) anything where I could go, "Oh, of course, that makes sense..." before a piece of information was helpful because it made it part of the flow.
So this ended up with me getting As in the classes that fit how I learned, Bs where I didn't and the material was easy, and Cs where I didn't and the material was hard and all I could do was try to brute force my way through it (and the only reason it ever, ever worked because it was hard and everyone else had a tough time; Calc 2 and Organic Chemistry were both curved). Not because I was particularly good at memorizing stuff, I was just good at picking out what I'd need to generate answers later. I'm not particularly smart, and I have shit for work ethic, but I'd still get people asking me for help studying in those A classes, but it's got nothing to do with my method. My studying technique was "Eat a lot, sleep a lot, show up for class, skim the provided lecture notes once before the exam".
I don't really know where I'm going with this. I actually typed up another paragraph, but it ended up being a repetition of what I said before. So I guess I'll just say that I've felt boxed in by assumptions about what I was really like, even if those assumptions come out as praise. If people say that I'm especially smart, I just think they have a different definition of what "smart" means.
...
Good lord, this post is pretty egotistical, isn't it? Oh well, too tired not to click post. HOORAY FOR EARLY MORNING HUBRIS