So I was watching Star Trek: Voyager (hey, shut up, I liked that one) and got to the rape-analogue episode (well, one of them at least). Short version, a character starts having flashbacks of being tied down and some samples of key parts of her anatomy (that would be of interest to the guest star of the episode) being taken from her forcibly, and you can tell fairly obviously from the way everybody responds that this is supposed to be the equivalent of rape but they couldn't get an actual episode about that topic to air.
And holy shit. The moral of that episode seriously was, "Being supportive of potential victims will lead innocent men to suicide." It turns out the whole thing is repressed memories from her past that she's projecting onto this guest star, who freaks out and ends up killing himself trying to escape needlessly, because they discover proof that he didn't really do it, and there was only one character who actually took her side blindly. The rest were all very emphatic about needing to have proof, etc. Which is what I'm complaining about, really, because the implication is apparently that even that is too much credence to give to the accusation.
I'd have posted it in the Progressive Rage thread, but really I don't think there'd be any meaningful discussion of a 13 year old science fiction show's importance, because there isn't a lot. I wouldn't even care that much if it weren't an episode clearly designed to reflect a real-world issue and be anvilicious about what the "correct" response is.