a. I have succumbed to the manifold seductions of Professor Honeydew D:
b. My introductory rhetoric course is going to be kind of painful in the ease department. Also, I once again realize exactly how uncomfortable I feel in non-technical majors. After class--after 50 minutes of the professor explaining how special humans are because they communicate and can rationalize (and the retarded? and the autistic? and the untrained? and the mentally ill? Is this what really "makes us human beings," and thus worthy of protection? Do we really want IQ tests to turn into humanity tests?), and furthermore that rationalism began with Descartes, the first person to critique thought itself, to question what made humans special outside of theological constraints (I am somewhat iffy on this one, but... Thales, anyone? I'm sure this shit started happening earlier than that, and quite possibly in other regions than Western Europe) we moved on to get leaving.
Now, one of the things that happened was that I was going to go up, say hi, ask a little about his definitions and chosen constraints on his thinking, because he'd made them so extremely clear that I felt I could make a little headway, learn something about how he thought. This group of dudes and women was there already, though. No problem, thought I'd wait until the end, since the questions would take a while.
Some people asked about the wait list or final exam times. This included all the women other than myself. There were also some dudes in this group...
And then came the group of guys who showed up with a big smile, a handshake, and a namedrop (hi, I have nothing to contribute, and am one of 200 students! Let me personally introduce myself!), or some fucking terrible questions about what was being covered, employed in order to show off how smart they were. See, I have no issues in general with such things, when one honestly wants to know, but these were just dreadful things about "will you cover the differences between inductive and deductive reasoning" when
i. Asking such a question, in a very fast and assertive way, shows that one is more than comfortable enough with the terminology.
ii. If one is comfortable with the terminology, one knows that that is a very boring question and frankly mostly pointless in the contextual framework the professor set up.
iii. Since the question was prompted by the projected discussion of the detective novel as a device and the professor heavily implied that we would be talking about such forms of reasoning, periphrastically and without name-dropping, the query becomes even more pointless.
iv. This is not knowledge that takes so much effort to gain and control that it is worth showing off. Trust me.
The main reason why all this annoys me so much is obviously not that the askers were men. That was just a point of interest for me (maybe the annoying girls will come out in force on Monday). What bothers me is that I probably won't be able to go into office hours for weeks in order to get my questions answered, because I want to make it completely clear that I want to have a discussion, not an ego-stroking--and dropping names and dates in order to provide reference points for my thoughts would just make me look like I was showing off more, and textbook requests on the very first day of class would be equally rude.
I often wish that everyone followed the Math department's rules of social conduct--don't open your mouth unless you have something useful to SOMEONE to say! And don't jockey around for name-knowing and attention. The fact that a man is fairly famous doesn't mean he wants to have anything to do with you. If you're special, you'll shine all the same, even without showing up with a grin and a handshake.
At least I was the 1/200 student to know the answer to both questions he asked the class. I'll read up for now, and when it's time I'll be even better-informed.