Meh.
Vis-a-vis my wall-o'-post:
Thanks for your consolations, sympathies, and sigs. Bauglir is basically correct, with the following twist: I don't actually know what is correct or incorrect, but I do know that, having had loads of people tell me what my neurological setup is without any true insight into my past or current behavior and experience, I'm a bit tired of it.
There's also the theory that certain amount of intelligence => different thought schemas and pattern, so I don't know.
The thing to me that seems strange is that I feel almost like I've learned social skills the same way I learn any other language, which usually ends up with more fluidity than most nonnative speakers and more focused analytical power than native speakers, but a certain tendency towards "jolting breakdowns" that leave me at capacity = 0 sometimes.
I can say I definitely learned quite a few social skills over the past years, and that my "initial history" had me rather disadvantaged compared to most people, with a gap that slowly increased; I never got into trouble because the "rules of engagement" were very clearly laid out for everyone. It was things like "talk to other children" that caught me up.
So, what can I say? It's like the diagnostic measures half-fit and half don't-fit, not in terms of elements, but in terms of time frame. At this point I identify with the diagnosis because I have quite a bit of trouble relating to others still, with an obvious demarcation between "off" and "on" that takes a good amount of problematic time to boot up, and with "on" rather shitty in certain respects.
It's not really that important, but I'd like to be able to decide for myself, rather than being told what I am. That's all.