Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Pandarsenic]

I'm here, I'm here.

...

I'm gone again. I'd prefer you not lynch me but I won't throw a fit defending myself if you decide to because I'm tired and I'm going to sleep but first I need to shower and then that'll be like 2 o'clock my time and then I have class at 9 so I'll have to wake up at 8 to be there on time which I clearly won't succeed at so I'll get there like 15-30 minutes late and oh WHATEVER I'm going now.

[dakarian]

That gave me memories of my own college life.

[Mr.Person]

I'm here, I'm here.

...

I'm gone again. I'd prefer you not lynch me but I won't throw a fit defending myself if you decide to because I'm tired and I'm going to sleep but first I need to shower and then that'll be like 2 o'clock my time and then I have class at 9 so I'll have to wake up at 8 to be there on time which I clearly won't succeed at so I'll get there like 15-30 minutes late and oh WHATEVER I'm going now.

Well, do make sure you actually post some content when you get back.

Whenever you change your tactic, those that are using your meta will be more suspicious of you.

Whenever you use a tactic that causes you to look worse against certain players, those people will think worse of you.


You can change your tactics, but always be prepared for the backlash of suspicion and be ready to stand for it. 


i.e. the fact that you're still not trying to scumhunt is really really bothering me.  That you need to defend is irrelevant, since it just takes typing two posts: one to defend, one to attack.  Ignore folks that don't like it (i.e. the 'deflecting' argument) because they are fools that would vote for you no matter what you do.


Meanwhile, I think Pandar either needs a prod.  If he's actually here but lurking, then a lynch instead.

There are good deflections and there are bad deflections. The difference is realizing when the deflector is only trying to get suspicion off themself  and onto the deflectee and isn't really scumhunting as campared to trying to see if other people are scum and maybe get the town to actually lynch some scum. It's kind of a hard distinction to be made, but it's only as hard as telling a town player apart from a scum player in a normal game.

[dakarian]

That's true, but I was framing the statement to fight the "I don't want to attack because it makes me look scummy" crowd.  I also get the 'deflection' argument on me since I get more aggressive the move votes on me in a rush to try to get my words  out before a lynch.

Moral is: even if others think you are scum for it, do it anyway.

[Pandarsenic]

Feh. I slept through my lectures today anyway.

... Don't wanna post content. ;_; Soon, though. Srsly.

[webadict]

Vote Count (5 to Lynch)
Apostolic Nihilist - NUKE9.13
ExKirby - Pandarsenic, Leafsnail, Vector
dakarian - Org
Pandarsenic - Apostolic Nihilist, dakarian
Vector - Mr.Person

[dakarian]

there's a line between when a person is just dealing with RL and when a person is active lurking while riding their RL to keep from posting.

I still believe the former.  However, you're on the line now.  Besides, I'm making it clear that I dislike "Oh, sorry I wasn't around" non-content posts in general. 

Ex I STILL waiting for his attempt to scumhunt.

[Pandarsenic]

You'll probably get my rough impressions of people in my reread over anything specific, but I had another speculation: Our colors might, perhaps, be related to the sanity or other hidden traits of the role. For instance, blue might be sane cop, sane doctor, etc., and say, pink cop might be naive cop or 0% cop and 0% doctor.

That sort of thing.

[Pandarsenic]

Are we still suspicious of NUKE9.13 for his jump on Org, King of Easy Lynches?

Also, something seems off about Dakarian and Apostolic Nihilist, though I couldn't tell you what or why. :I

[dakarian]

We are nonexistant.

You are voting for absolutely no reason what so ever and don't seem to worry about it.  I have a vote on you because you're stalling like CRAZY.

the passive accusation is even worse. 

As for the colors.. we just won't know until they start coming to effect.  I've taken to the stance that they are best left alone for now. 


Imo, the rough impression is..ok, but i'd rather have a direct attack against someone with a vote to match. 

[Pandarsenic]

I'd vote Nuke but that would-

Wait, no deadlines, Hammer only.

Right.

Unvote anyone I was voting because I honestly don't know if I'm voting someone now. NUKE9.13, why would you do that?

[dakarian]

@Pandar

Better.. though what are you referring to?


@Web

Either I missed some recent posts or Nuke needs a prod badly

[Pandarsenic]

Pages 2 & 3 on largest-size pageview, possibly just 3, he insisted Org was scum based on an old scumtell.

[Org]

 

Dont be mean Web. Just playing Last Stand.....a little to much.....

Old scumtell is old.

I am the king. I rule with an iron fist.

I actually think Pandar might be right about the colors. Or they are nothing. :I

I am not lurking actively, more of a passive lurking, if you will.

I will stick to my convictions.

[dakarian]

heh.. call Org's name and he calls to protect himself.

Even though the topic is how the one who attacked him was wrong.

Hyperdefensive I see Org.  Also good to know that you are trying to lay low and not just 'busy'.


@pandar

So basically you are trying to lynch someone based on MY argument, even to the point of using MY words for it.

A tip: Next time you want to hide your scumminess, put your vote on me.  I instaattack those that mimic my arguments to support me.