Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[dakarian]

diakron seems scummy, with all the color thing. So voting Diakron for the time being.

Quick Q:  "With all the color thing"

Mind explaining that?

[ExKirby]

diakron seems scummy, with all the color thing. So voting Diakron for the time being.

Quick Q:  "With all the color thing"

Mind explaining that?

Well, for all the reasons that have been previously mentioned?

[Org]

If either Toony or Vector is Vector's/Toony's partner, it might be Nuke. He still hasnt posted since I asked him about his vote. :I

[webadict]

Vote Count (5 to Lynch)
Apostolic Nihilist - dakarian, Leafsnail
ExKirby - Pandarsenic
Org - NUKE9.13
Diakron - ExKirby

Don't vote in weird colors. Vote in Red, or I'll get upset and miss your vote.

[dakarian]

diakron seems scummy, with all the color thing. So voting Diakron for the time being.

Quick Q:  "With all the color thing"

Mind explaining that?

Well, for all the reasons that have been previously mentioned?

Mind rementioing them?  Using quotes is fine.

[ExKirby]

Let's consider the scenarios:

A) There is a role which has a list of all the colours (and the roles that they have)

B) Scum have a list of all the colours (and the roles that they have)

C) This is a ploy by webadict to spread distrust throughout us all.


If B is true, then claiming our colours is the worst thing we can possibly do. If A is true, it's still bad, but not as bad. If C is true, it doesn't really matter either way. If A is true, then there's likely another role which can determine the colour someone has, but not the role.

Now, our lack of knowledge regarding this can be used by clever mafia very easily. They can try and trick us into thinking that:

A) Our colours mean nothing (if they do; they'll try and get us to claim in an effort to prove their theory while simultaneously getting a list of who has what role )
or
B) Our colours mean something (if they don't, then they'll try and spread misinformation, suggesting that our colours are important/do mean something and anyone who colour claims will immediately appear scummy. Admittedly, alone, there aren't many foreseeable advantages to this, but if there is a role that determines colours, and that role thinks that the colours mean something, then much fun could be had.)

Anyone suggesting that we claim our colours is scummy, Dakarian. I may have been more accurate with my random vote than I thought.

Furthermore, you say that your colour doesn't fit your role; this implies that you have a role which doesn't suit your colour.
Ex: Blue cop, green doctor, red mafia.

[dakarian]

Quick nitpick:

Dakarian = WOTer with the Black and white burmise Paranoid Vigilante named Litia.

Diakron = No Avatared player that isn't in this game


Dakarian =! Diakron

(And yes, I had to look back to realize Diakron wasn't playing here )

[Leafsnail]

The Bay 12 Mafia roles were made with that in mind, Dracron Drakonian Diakron Dakarian.

[ExKirby]

Quick nitpick:

Dakarian = WOTer with the Black and white burmise Paranoid Vigilante named Litia.

Diakron = No Avatared player that isn't in this game


Dakarian =! Diakron

(And yes, I had to look back to realize Diakron wasn't playing here )

Whoops. Change my vote to Dakarian. That was very stupid of me. 

[Org]

Vote Count (5 to Lynch)
Apostolic Nihilist - dakarian, Leafsnail
ExKirby - Pandarsenic
Org - NUKE9.13
Diakron - ExKirby

Don't vote in weird colors. Vote in Red, or I'll get upset and miss your vote.

After reading these last posts, and looking at this, I have this to say:

I lul'd.

[Apostolic Nihilist]

Unvote.

Apostolic Nihilist, why is wanting to survive a scumtell?  The only role on the list Webadict posted that would want to be lynched is the Jester.  All other roles on the list would want to survive to help their team (or themselves, in the case of the Survivor and SK).

I don't think I answered this — anyways, here's my thoughts on why it's scummy.

He wasn't just trying to survive, he was trying to survive perhaps at the peril of everyone else. If colours really are significant and we claimed them, as he said, we could potentially play right into the mafia's hands.

There's a small chance that colours are attached to roles somehow, and so there's a small chance that if we did what he said, everyone would learn our roles; a bad situation to be in, day 1.

[dakarian]

And if the colors are a negative feature?  If they alter our vote or play with the power roles?

The puzzle about a Bastard Mod is to find out just what the host has slipped in before it bites you in the "OMG".  Finding out whether colors mean anything really DO affect us.

Example: What IF the votes were based on color choice rather than name written?  Then we'd have no clue who we are lynching. 

You say there's a small chance that the color would affect our role.  I say there's a slightly better chance that the colors affect the game.  There's also an equal chance, as others have said, that it's a red herring.

I'm agreeing now that for now we should focus on the scumhunt rather than a color fight. Just know that this was the mentality behind my actions before.

So.. back to the scumhunt.

Nuke  I was hoping to read of your answer to Org's question.  I do wonder your reasonings for what you said.

[Vector]

ExKirby, mind answering my question?

[NUKE9.13]

Org is always scum.
More seriously
Org is always scum unless he specifically says he isn't.
Its just the way things are. We are all powerless to stop it.

[Org]

Org is always scum.
More seriously
Org is always scum unless he specifically says he isn't.
Its just the way things are. We are all powerless to stop it.

No , I am not scum. This is like what happened to Inaluct, as he was almost always scum, but whenever you lynched him, he was town.

Where is Inaluct anyway?