I guess I should just start randomly voting again, then? I had my vote on Dakarian for a while, but that ended up fruitless.
I don't see NUKE as particularly scummy, a vote on Mr.Person would be an OMGUS, etc.
Er... actually, there's
Pandarsenic. He hasn't said much in the past 4 pages. This was his last post of note:
While I believe the color has some influence on the game, there's now way for us to establish that except by simply playing.
Which is basically just a rehash of ideas already thrown around by everyone else.
He really has been silent. Extremely silent.
The sudden different behaviour doesn't seem right; Beginner's 2, for instance; he won, and was aggressive. I'll stick by my assumption that he's not mafia but an anti-town role.
He'd be more careful to deflect suspicion if he were mafia, but with a role he's not sure what to do.
Or something like that.
As for my last post being useless; it was really just explaining my views on the "Hey let's vote AN!" mentality that seemed to be sweeping through everyone.
I'm not going to fault anyone for it, of course — even if we do have a minuscule chance of actually voting and lynching mafia on Day 1, I suppose the practice itself isn't bad, right?
Actually, I can't easily recall many games that have had a mafia lynch D1. I'd say 90% of the time (at least) it's been a townie who dies.
That's why I don't like lynching for D1 mistakes; pushing & prodding, trying to draw out more mistakes, sure; but lynching? It's a bit much. At least wait until we have evidence to go off of, I say.
I've been trying to defend myself a bit overzealously, so I've probably dug my own grave, but even so...