Firstly: You do realise that this claim sounds like something that a scum would make to get themselves out of trouble, right?
Yes I realize that it could be interpreted as such. To that, I pose two questions.
1. Why would scum do such a thing? Why would scum draw so much attention to himself? True scum would have answered each question and let the scrutiny move on. You guys say townies have nothing to hide, but scum can easily answer questions like that without giving anything away.
2. You were in the last mafia game with me. Was that behavior not completely out of character? I am not a defeatist in general, I play the game to have fun and to win. I understand that roles don't win (though they do help) in mafia, even in a game like this with so many power roles. Hell, look at last game... I stuck to my guns despite pressure and interrogation from everyone on the townie team.
Secondly: How does the fact that you were play acting invalidate my arguments? If you were acting, it was top-quality acting, so my arguments which were designed to apply to reality should also apply to your actings. Obviously if you were acting I should now withdraw my arguments, but your claims that my arguments or actions are scummy because they were based on a lie are wrong, because I did not know you were acting.
I don't recall claiming that your arguments or actions were scummy; just that they are false because they are based on false information.
Thirdly: Go to hollywood because hot damn if that is your acting you could make a blockbuster all on your own, like that austin powers fellow.
Thank you, I think? I have been roleplaying since I was 12, and when I got the goth role the whole plan fell into place in my head. I just had to wait until someone voted me or expressed suspicion that I could turn into a small argument.
Fourthly: Thirdly means I don't reaaally believe you. You claim to have an accomplice. If you are willing to share this accomplice with us, along with a confession by this accomplice, then I would be willing to reconsider.
You're free to believe what you like. As for my 'accomplice' (your word, not mine) what I said was that only one person was aware of what I was doing. Someone guessed that I was bluffing and called it in a PM. I'm not going to take the liberty of revealing this person's name, if he wants to come out then he will.
My vote stands.
Okay. I'm still undecided so I'll leave myself at no vote for now. I'm having trouble deciding between two people right now.
second, forsaken1111's lack of defense... well, I've said what I have to say about it.
Sorry, what have I failed to defend against? Its entirely possible I missed something, the posts are going fast and I'm very tired now.