And already accusing me of scum? I'm not defending him, I'm saying your tunnel-visioning. We need to keep our eyes open to other people who may be scum, and just jumping on the bandwagoning, going for the easy lynch. Thats why I'm asking Exkirby for his reasoning, instead of just letting him jump on this bandwagon.
Ah-ha. Yes, I am a moron. Thank you for that information.
EBWOP: Also, you know telling us about your meta data might have been useful beforehand, not just right now? Its kind of important to tell us everything you know about the target.
Vote: Eduren
Didn't do that because I figured I had a day to watch everyone; I would have given out everything at the beginning of D2, but there were these midterm things that jumped on me and stole all my time. Scum-data is useless until you can lead a successful attack, because otherwise you're just tipping off the scum that you're watching for certain behaviors. Better to let them breathe easy and accumulate mistakes until you jump them.
1. My "Active lurking". You will notice, those that have played against me before that my so called Active Lurking is my normal behavior. While thats not what i would call it, I do it very often. Call it a bad habit picked up from BM1.
This is different than normal. This time, you're directing the town and building bandwagons. I remember BM1. You attacked people and didn't say much of value or reason. This time, you're saying plenty, but being very careful not to attack people. You're trying to get people to vote whoever the town is focusing on. This is markedly different even from your behavior in other current Mafias.
3. Jumpiness. He jumped at criptfeind's ridiculous FoS and tried to deflect blame for Major_Sephiroth's death onto me
Jumpy? I understood that his FoS was due to webadicts direction, but I wanted to hear him say it. I was making him think more carefully about finding his own suspicions.
Deflect blame? Do you like playing the victim? I was just pointing out that what web was saying was pretty ludicrous.
What, that newbies kill differently than people who are familiar with the game? That's definitely true. Besides, if Webadict were scum, he'd have no reason to go after you. He could easily lead a lynch on anyone, particularly Diakron. Heck, he even could have pushed Diakron and then gotten the town to turn on me while building a third lynch to line up after that.
Hm. Sounds like what you're doing, doesn't it?
Additionally, he said in his post that he was following Webadict's advice. I still think you jumped. If you wanted to show that Webadict was being ludicrous, why say that I could have just as easily made the kill? A better argument would be in saying that a beginner would have done the same, rather than move suspicions onto me as a "third IC." As it is, you certainly deflected.
So you're saying this entire post had no original thinking?
I'm saying your post is a distillation of what everyone else has said, and mostly turns into "Hey guys, forget about me! Think about Diakron!!"
You bring up a good point, he is not contributing much. Eduren, why not give us some analyze of the posts so far, and who's on your scum list? We could do with a scent to track right now.
Hey guys let's kill Diakron
I never said that. I was noting that nobody seemed to continue the antics of yesterday. I was wondering your thoughts on that mostly.
... No, you didn't say it. You just brought up behavior and, rather than providing your opinion on it, asked what others thought. That is an indirect bandwagon. When confronted with questions, you ask more questions. You try to influence others. You deflect.
Sounds like you're parroting your own reason for staying on ExKirby and doing nothing else for pretty much all of D1, doesn't it?
Honestly? After Diakrons outburst I didn't want to pressure him too much. I can't apologize for being human and feeling sympathy.
Oh, and that sucks about your hand dude.
Way to deflect. This has nothing to do with Diakron. This has to do with accusing someone of something you have done yourself. Additionally, if you want pressure off of Diakron, why don't you go find some more scum? I suppose that leading a Diakron-bandwagon is a better idea, and less pressuring?
Webadict. Vector could either be a determined townie, or an aggressive scum buddy but we'll deal with that later.
Webadict is leading a lynch against me because when I turn up town, he will get away with it. He will be looking especially townie with his aggressiveness. All he has to do is say "My bad, he really was acting scummy".
Webadict: Can you explain your lurking Day1?
I don't think you're going to be able to redirect the IC-focus onto Webadict, dude. Nice try. "We'll deal with that later?" We'll deal with me later if I end up doing something scumtastic, but right now we're dealing with you. Not Diakron or Webadict, but you.
Further, nice OMGUS vote, and well-done on pinning him as an "aggressive lurker." This is not Webadict being aggressive--or do you not remember what happened D2 of BM1? I might agree with you if you thought he was being too passive. This, however, is not aggression.
Trust me, if you turn up town Webadict is not going to get away with it. He knows how you play, and if he leads us to town in a beginner's game then he will fall under deep suspicion as well.
Author
Topic: Beginner Mafia 3: It all ends in silence. (Read 44349 times)