I'm not quite sure why you FOS'ed me, Apostolic. You said yourself that we both came to the same conclusion regarding Webadict, then you say I'm suspicious because I brought my views up.
You're suspicious only if webadict is town. If he's scum, then you were spot-on and completely accurate. My point was that scum would likely try and frame webadict, trying to get him lynched, by leaving several clues leading to him. If the citizenry didn't pick up on the clues, then one of them would have to step forth and point it out.
So! Day One, we have random voting, me looking scummy-ish, and Webadict clearing the heat off me ever so slightly, but its a Beginner game, and I am a beginner, so, nothing to think TOO hard on. But I still mentioned it here, if any of you savvy types noticed that.
RedWarrior seemed like that kind of person who cheers from the sidelines, if you know what I mean. Well, you probably don't, so here are some examples.
What a looming question to ask. Seems like a lose/lose situation for me, too, if I answer it.
How so?
I'd like to know that too.
Also, FoS Dr. Johbson for the reasons Vector voted him.
Yes, they are both regarding me, and are both horrible examples of scummy-ness, and its not like we have many of his posts to go by, seeing as how I quoted half of them right there. But thats not the point, this is just an example of what I meant. He also never asked anything too deep and never pressured too much. Seems like trying to stay out of the spotlight, there.
He's a beginner, of course. I think we can clear him simply because Dakarian was quite quick to replace him (or at least try to); his lack of activity is suspicious, but it's also a viable mafia tactic; most hosts would be hesitant to replace scum using scummy tatics; now, town on the other hand...
Let's see, whos next. Well, why not a mention of Eduren? I re-read his posts the other day. In hindsight, he was scummy. I don't think I have to talk too much about this mate, so I won't. Just throwing that out there.
Yes; looking back at his posts, he was exceptionally scummy for the most part. (This is how most scum posts are once you know they were made by scum, though). Taking out scum so early on, lead by our own IC, webadict; it probably 'proved' he was town to most of the newbs. Furthermore, it gives us a fighting chance, having only one scum to worry about (albeit one of the most skilled...); maybe they thought it was unfair to have both ICs be mafia, so they devised that plan?
Uhm..TehStefen or something. I don't think I got any bad vibes off this guy. Seems to be scum hunting and all that nice stuff.
Diakron. Is Diakron, meaning scummy in nature but nothing too deep. Next!
Agreed. Diakron is somewhat scummy, but he's -always- somewhat scummy. The only thing that stands out is how his 'outburst' seemed so fake. Diakron prided himself on his cleverness posts earlier, and I'm sure we all know how easy it is to fake emotions on the internet. His typing style makes me think that he's not scum, simply because such an advanced ploy is too risky -- there are easier ways to 'prove' your innocence.
I didn't think too much of ExKirby. If I remember correctly, I would have put him under my "Slightly Scummy List," But then again, I would have probably put myself in there if I could.
Looking more at ExKirby's recent behaviour in other games, I'd agree with you here. He's clearly just a newb so he always acts scummy.
...I'm going to vote for webadict again.
If he's town, he knows he'll die tonight from the NK; lynching him won't really affect anything. We'll lose a townie, but we would've lost him anyways.
If he's scum, then he's probably already thought up a plan to divert attention away from himself when he doesn't die.
As town, we have three choices:
A) Lynch webadict. This is the one I'm going for; it probably isn't right, but we only have hunches to go off of right now.
B) Lynch someone else. This could work, but who? Lurkers aren't inherently scummy, especially in a newbie game, and the only other active person is Dr.Johbson (and myself, I suppose); Diakron isn't worth lynching.
C) Don't lynch anyone.
This could be dangerous. It could be our best choice, but it effectively just boils down to 'waiting it out', which is something town should never resort to. One more NK isn't going to give us much evidence; we need to push on with what we have.
Unvote; vote
webadict.