Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[HFS]

So, I recently obtained (and beat) the game Antichamber.

I remember seeing a Portal 2 video on non-Euclidean game design, and thinking, "I want to see a puzzle game based on this."

Lo and behold, Antichamber.

Plus a few other interesting mechanics, of course.

[Slayerhero90]

Don't fuck with trains.

[Heron TSG]

I am annoyed by people posting bullshit philosophical rhetorical questions and quotes on their Facebook walls. To remedy this, I answered most of their rhetorical questions with flowcharts.

Probably not the most efficient use of time, but it made me giggle inside.

[Xantalos]

I am annoyed by people posting bullshit philosophical rhetorical questions and quotes on their Facebook walls. To remedy this, I answered most of their rhetorical questions with flowcharts.

Probably not the most efficient use of time, but it made me giggle inside.

Please insert example onto Bay12 Forums.

[penguinofhonor]

Example question:

Is it really not anything but a chicken wing?

Now respond as if I were your facebook friend. For response purposes, my name will be Benjamin Dover.

[Xantalos]

Example question:

Is it really not anything but a chicken wing?

Now respond as if I were your facebook friend. For response purposes, my name will be Benjamin Dover.

I don't do Facebook. How do you talk there?

Proper English?
L33t s934k?
Lol englsh?

[penguinofhonor]

Oh, that was targeted at Barbarossa. I want his flowchart response.

[MonkeyHead]

Oh, that was targeted at Barbarossa. I want his flowchart response.

Personally I think that one you postulated would be best solved with a Venn diagram.

[Heron TSG]

Is it really not anything but a chicken wing?

That's a little simpler to solve than most, but easy.



I mean stuff like this.

How can you know what's best for me, without knowing who I am? How could I let you know who I am, without knowing who you are first?

The logical solution here is to meet somebody that's willing to introduce him/herself first, and then introduce yourself to let them know who you are. Because they know who you are, they can know what's best for you. It is implied that they receive the knowledge of the optimal course of action by knowing who you are. But if all it requires to learn that fact is knowing oneself, the second person is redundant and the question negates itself.

♥☆~~The solution is to follow your heart!~~☆♥

The whole concept of asking Facebook a rhetorical question just seems passive aggressive and wrong. The status bar asks, "What's happening, [name]?". It doesn't ask you to whine at the entire world using an interrogative sentence that you don't intend to get an answer to. This part makes me RAAAAAAGE a bit, and it makes me a bit sad, or perhaps a little WTF. But being able to answer all of these impossible questions and get into deep philosophical arguments with (what Facebook calls) my friends makes me happy, even if it's a personal inside joke at their expense. I don't mean any harm by it.

[MonkeyHead]

Facebook: your number 1 resource for readng everyone elses first world problems.

[fqllve]

A spot's opened up, so I'm discussing my FF6 AU D&D game again.

...

that sounds amazing. Just knowing something like that exists would make my world a little bit better.

[Korbac]

Is it really not anything but a chicken wing?

That's a little simpler to solve than most, but easy.



I mean stuff like this.

How can you know what's best for me, without knowing who I am? How could I let you know who I am, without knowing who you are first?

The logical solution here is to meet somebody that's willing to introduce him/herself first, and then introduce yourself to let them know who you are. Because they know who you are, they can know what's best for you. It is implied that they receive the knowledge of the optimal course of action by knowing who you are. But if all it requires to learn that fact is knowing oneself, the second person is redundant and the question negates itself.

♥☆~~The solution is to follow your heart!~~☆♥

The whole concept of asking Facebook a rhetorical question just seems passive aggressive and wrong. The status bar asks, "What's happening, [name]?". It doesn't ask you to whine at the entire world using an interrogative sentence that you don't intend to get an answer to. This part makes me RAAAAAAGE a bit, and it makes me a bit sad, or perhaps a little WTF. But being able to answer all of these impossible questions and get into deep philosophical arguments with (what Facebook calls) my friends makes me happy, even if it's a personal inside joke at their expense. I don't mean any harm by it.

Lmao! Amazing. I getcha why that would be annoying, and I've seen it done before quite often, much to my irritation. I do admit that I've done it before, but I never really mean anything I say like that on facebook.

The quote which really annoys me is the Marilyn Monroe one. It's basically a way for people to promote themselves without showing and relevant qualities.

[The Darkling Wolf]

Facebook: your number 1 resource for readng everyone elses first world problems.

And then go read the shitty ragecomics they make about people who post 'going to the shops' get more likes than their cookiecutter armchair philosophy, or quote that stopped being relevant 80 years ago.

[Lagslayer]

Don't fuck with trains.

That movie was simultaneously really weird, strangely horrifying, and really catchy.

[Korbac]

Don't fuck with trains.

That movie was simultaneously really weird, strangely horrifying, and really catchy.

SPEAKING OF TRAINS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbLGOYsRtx8&list=UUUExw363CS_aAu8IIthh5pQ&index=25

(I did the terrible vocals on this lmao)