geez, didn't I say that my men would only retreat from the incoming reinforcements should their losses be higher than a certain amount ?
I don't see any losses, on neither side. Why would my men already retreat if no blood has been shed at all?
aaaaannyway
Kestrel, who is by far exceeding Munisai's expectations, is once more rewarded. This time, he is not only given the same amount of money and the decorated skull of his enemy, but in addition is given a marriage proposal to marry one of Munisai's daughters, not a bad party. The approval of Kestrels father is however still pending. ((as are the freaking supplies I asked from him, geez doesn't he care about his son starving in battle?))
Munisai has observed that Kestrel seems fairly unable to properly lead the men under his command. In an attempt to make him more liked an accepted by his unit, the unit that served under him while he killed the enemies commander is also rewarded in silver.
For now, the enemy is observed, to judge wether or not he is going to attack the walls. If so, splendid, battle commences against the fortifications.
If not, then in a last attempt to break the siege to gather supplies, all avaiable units shall attack once more. They shall however not leave the city through the main gate, but through a smaller side gate, in an attempt to catch the siege-force off-guard, where they are weaker.
If this works, supplies are gathered.
If this however does not work, then, after retreating back into the city, the horses of the cavalry unit shall be slain to supply the men with food. The former cavalry is handed bows, they are now servign as archers IF I have to slay their horses. They do not become archers if supplies could be gathered.
Please note that the horses are only slain IF we don't manage to get any supplies. The word "IF" plays a big role in my posts, so this time, no retreat without any blodshed