And I thought being aggressive was bad. I am a regular townie. That is what I mean by not powerful. If I was mafia I would have alluded to having some sort of power, so a townie would hesitate to lynch me. Free Beer, you are just going over the top. If I was the cop, I would have alluded to it to let the doctor (if there is one) know. If I was the doc I would have hid it too.
I now have solid bets on Free Beer being mafia, because he is a little too trigger happy. He also seems to have a vendetta against me. Free Beer, if it is any consolation, I am likely going to be lynched in Vote Mafia because I thought you were remorseful.
Sonerage, don't bandwagon. I am now suspicious of you as well.
Screw OMGUS, vote Free Beer.
Oh, so I'm the one that's trigger happy, when it was you who didn't want to be random voted and ignored any inquiries? Yeah, right. I will refrain from talking about Vote Mafia, since it's an ongoing game.
You claim to be a regular townsperson, and yet you have not provided any sort of account for your suspicious behavior. Furthermore, you provide us with this gem:
Sonerage, don't bandwagon. I am now suspicious of you as well.
This is an obvious attempt to intimidate Sonearage into unvoting. You'll notice I tried to pull similar tricks in Vote Mafia 3, when I was scum. I classify your response as an overreaction. Yeah, you're scum. I'm certain. Your latest post is nothing but an attempt to salvage the situation.
Vote Free Beer. he does not have any reason to be leading a lynch right now other then the fact that some one doesn't want to reveal their role.
Diakron, my reason for attacking major_sephiroth is that he acted scummy by going out of his way to avoid answering questions. You will note that my inquiry into his role occurred AFTER I FoS'd him twice.
Free Beer, do you even care if we lynch a townie?
I'm at least as suspicious of you as I am of him, mainly since your only grounds for accusing him is about as likely to hit useful town roles.
Do you even care about lynching scum, Pandarsenic? Furthermore, now that major_sephiroth has roleclaimed as a townsperson, the defense you presented on his behalf is now void.
You will note that nobody actually made any attempt to argue that I was in fact wrong. Prior to your post, the only person who even suggested it was Pandarsenic, and his only reason is the patently ridiculous theory that I'm rolefishing mafia.
No, I'm excited about having found scum for the first time. My reasoning is flawless.
you refuse to accept or acknowledge your possible fallacy - even though it is clearly very possible that you are wrong. this suggests to me that you don't actually think he might be mafia, but are actually trying to influence the town to knock off one of their own.
The only way I could be wrong is if major_sephiroth is indeed a regular townsperson. In that case, the only motive he would have had to behave that way (assuming that he is not just stupid, of course) was if he wanted to bait the mafia into nightkilling him, which after I called him out became a useless proposition. He would have dropped the act shortly thereafter. However, he did not. However, I'm operating under the assumption that the other players are not stupid. You call my argument a fallacy, when it is in fact quite sound.
You sir, are an idiot. I'll keep my list of how crap you are organised:
1: Being trigger happy is going out guns blazing, killing all you see, etc. It is NOT avoiding bullets and ignoring enquiries. If I was trigger happy, I would have voted you far earlier than I did. And when did I ignore an enquiry? If you ask me something, make it obvious so I don't just look over your post as another rant against me.
2: The Sonerage bit. I see that as they are scum, who you bullied into voting for me. They seemed hesitant. I didn't realise you pulled this 'trick' off. If I was scum, I sure as well wouldn't copy what you did, as it led to failure. If I was trying to intimidate someone, I would do it in alot more words.
3: Here is the evidence of why I am acting suspicious: I'm a paranoid prick. My character is having an influence on this game, it would seem.
4: This one isn't for FB, but for Diakron: I have claimed to be a regular townie, so your argument has to be re-thought.
5: I would say, with conviction, that Pandar is just cautious. The crap that caution is a scumtell is way off. He is (likely) waiting for more evidence before he attacks anyone. I would have done the same, if you didn't want me dead.
6: I would likely call your argument a fallacy, if I understood a word of it. I looked at the wikipedia page, and sheds no light on it.
Author
Topic: Beginner's Mafia 2 - Game over. (Read 32072 times)