Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 69 70 [71] 72 73 ... 199

Author Topic: Warhammer 40k  (Read 174088 times)

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1050 on: November 23, 2009, 05:56:49 pm »

How many can fit?
Logged
Shoes...

Org

  • Bay Watcher
  • Daring Hero
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1051 on: November 23, 2009, 05:59:15 pm »

Lootaz all the way. I'm not an idiot, and i've almost finished my squad of Trukkaz.

:P

Oh, and my trukkz can carry as many models as that fit. Awesome.
You mean 12.
Logged

Luke_Prowler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wait, how did I get back here?
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1052 on: November 24, 2009, 12:22:04 am »

Actually Org, I think the early codex let you put as many Orks in a Trukk as can fit. Not sure though.

Anyone play City of Death?
Logged

Quote from: ProtonJon
And that's why Communism doesn't work. There's always Chance Time

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1053 on: November 24, 2009, 02:48:28 am »

Actually Org, I think the early codex let you put as many Orks in a Trukk as can fit. Not sure though.

Actually i think you're right. I remember doing some really silly things to fit an entire 2000 point army into a single Trukk, i think i still have that Trukk actually, i remember i taped a bunch of crows nest things to it and piled all these Orks in, as well as hanging them off little chains and stuff.

Possibly i could have just been doing it for shits and giggles, that would also be entirely plausible.

Jakkarra

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Chairman.
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1054 on: November 24, 2009, 02:52:16 am »

One good shot, and you lose them all.

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1055 on: November 24, 2009, 02:59:51 am »

Which is entirely irrelevant in the face of 2000 points worth of Orks in a single Trukk.

Jakkarra

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Chairman.
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1056 on: November 24, 2009, 10:44:55 am »

Not really, if the trukk A'splodes, you could stand to lose every model.

That'd be a bit of a crimp.

Keita

  • Bay Watcher
  • Easily Confused
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1057 on: November 24, 2009, 12:26:09 pm »

That would prably be the Orkiest way to go
Logged
Gravity is a government conspiracy to keep us down

Jakkarra

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Chairman.
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1058 on: November 24, 2009, 12:51:33 pm »

I'd say the orkiest way to go would be to Slice your own head off with a gun that fires flaming Sawblades.

Org

  • Bay Watcher
  • Daring Hero
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1059 on: November 24, 2009, 01:11:33 pm »

Actually Org, I think the early codex let you put as many Orks in a Trukk as can fit. Not sure though.

Anyone play City of Death?
Early codex? As in not 4th edition codex from 2008?

I do. Tabled(Im so awesome) some tyranids without losing an entire unit.
Logged

Servant Corps

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1060 on: November 24, 2009, 02:46:20 pm »

Quote
The Ciaphas Cain books were great. And I believe non-canon in that the central figures aren't batshit insane imbeciles, and that the IG uses tactics more appropriate to, you know, the technology they have. Actual guns, and tanks, and planes, and whatnot. Rather than the primitive, WWI-esque bullshit that appears to be more canon.

Anything that Black Library produces is canon, except when they say otherwise. But don't worry: the galaxy is a big place, and can tolerate strange and weird devations like Ciaphas Cain.
Logged
I have left Bay12Games to pursue a life of non-Bay12Games. If you need to talk to me, please email at me at igorhorst at gmail dot com.

Org

  • Bay Watcher
  • Daring Hero
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1061 on: November 24, 2009, 02:49:28 pm »

Quote
The Ciaphas Cain books were great. And I believe non-canon in that the central figures aren't batshit insane imbeciles, and that the IG uses tactics more appropriate to, you know, the technology they have. Actual guns, and tanks, and planes, and whatnot. Rather than the primitive, WWI-esque bullshit that appears to be more canon.

Anything that Black Library produces is canon, except when they say otherwise. But don't worry: the galaxy is a big place, and can tolerate strange and weird devations like Ciaphas Cain.
Duh.
Logged

Neruz

  • Bay Watcher
  • I see you...
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1062 on: November 24, 2009, 05:25:58 pm »

Plus i think the Imperium is due one sensible, intelligent commander who can actually achieve his objectives.

Luke_Prowler

  • Bay Watcher
  • Wait, how did I get back here?
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1063 on: November 24, 2009, 11:17:55 pm »

Plus i think the Imperium is due one sensible, intelligent commander who can actually achieve his objectives.

Then what does that make Creed, a tactical genius shaped baked potato?
Logged

Quote from: ProtonJon
And that's why Communism doesn't work. There's always Chance Time

Ampersand

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Warhammer 40k
« Reply #1064 on: November 25, 2009, 04:00:55 am »

No, he's just infiltrated behind it, along with a Titan.
Logged
!!&!!
Pages: 1 ... 69 70 [71] 72 73 ... 199