I'm back. The reaction to my proposed plan reminds me of the story of the small European town in WWII who hid their Jews from the Nazis by having everyone claim they were Jews. Words cannot express my disappointment.
Since I've got zero reliable information to go on, I elect
not to use my power to force a lynch, in hopes that the rest of the town as a collective will come to a better decision than just I myself. If this means I'll be the one lynched, then so be it - even though I know myself that the town is making a mistake doing so.
I am fourth-ing this. Mostly just to call bulls**t on the roleclaim. You did, in fact, vote Toony, I checked. But you can only use unlimited votes once, because it is a guaranteed lynch. And Toony was very well informed about his role during his feud with Diakron. And that feud is why you aren't dead yet. Or are you just big noting yourself to get a reaction? Either way, you can't take us all down, scum.
So yeah, I'm voting Free Beer again.
When I did this to ToonyMan, he tried to intimidate me into submission, which resulted in the current fiasco. I know firsthand that what you are doing is a very stupid move. I will not allow the same thing to happen again. Instead, I provide evidence for my roleclaim:
I direct ZERO votes at
Pandarsenic.
I think we can all agree that I am not the No Voter, the Unknown Voter, or the Negative Voter, due to information from the previous Day's vote count. Therefore, I think we can all agree that the only way I could possibly have zero votes today would be if I indeed were the Copycat Voter, and I willfully made my votes to have a value of zero through the use of the Unlimited Voter's power. If the Vote Counter does his thing, my role is officially confirmed. Sound good to you?
Once Free Beer says Pandar's role, the deceit I so strongly suspect will be revealed, and town victory will be much closer. This is a hell of a gamble, but it's necessary, you have to understand that.
You said yourself that Pandarsenic is obviously running some sort of reverse psychology ploy, and I concur. I'm not going to say his role's name. Instead, I offer the following alternative proposal: a side effect of being the Copycat Voter is that I learn the role information of who I vote for. If I vote for Pandarsenic today, I will be able to independently confirm whether he is fudging some facts about his role on Day Three.
Furthermore, if Pandarsenic is indeed telling the truth and people still think I am scum, they get to namekill me, and me alone, by saying my role's name on Day Three. A simple, yet effective plan, do you not agree?