I'm more suspicious of BloodBeard for this post. There's a decently long paragraph there that appears to be pointing out the scumminess of forsaken and then he doesn't actually go so far as to vote.
Because I don't need to vote for someone to put pressure on them. Not voting for him actualy told me more as he took it as an opportunity to take my accusation lightly and successfully deflected the attention away from himself, as i'm going to explain in this post.
I was going to go and defend myself in detail vs bloodbeard's post but I really don't think I need to. I've suspected for a long time that either Blood or Pandar were dopps. Since Pandar flipped town, I believe Blood is the Dopp and I have voted accordingly. It's not convenient deflection, it's just a statement of my opinion. Do what you will. Follow the bandwagon.
Congrats on successfully deflecting attention from yourself. I'm sorry but thinking that i'm a dopp doesn't make you immune to all attacks by me. You go on two paragraphs defending yourself and then you say:
Maybe we should look into all the people who were voting for Pandar to die, hmm?
If that isn't deflecting then I don't know what is. By the way, Cheeetar was scum and he didn't vote for Pandar. Toony is looking more and more town as things go by so i'm not going by the finals votes, but that's just my opinion. If you are town then you shouldn't have any problem defending yourself. Look at me, noone was voting for me on day one, people were lined up to lynch you and I welcomed people to come and give their reasons for suspecting me. I didn't have to.
That brings me to full circle, somewhat, to
Webadict. I was becoming less and less suspicious of you untill this:
Anyhow, Bloodbeard, what's up with you and forsaken?
And your subsequent post. This is what I was talking about with you asking bad questions, until I realized that it wasn't, it was actually a very good question. For a scum to ask. In your question at the start of the game and in these one you seem far less interested in gathering information from my responses and instead more interested in trying to make me make a scene, which is why I didn't go along with it. There was nothing 'between me and forsaken', and there would have been nothing for me to say other then what I already said in the post before. You knew that I would draw attentoin to myself again, and though I have no qualms about doing just that (no, REALLY?) I would have only made it look like I was desperately defending myself against him when I didn't need to.
This just doesn't seem like the playing style of an expert townie, it seems more like an expert scum trying to cause arguing between two people to take the focus off you. I'm willing to argue, but not with who you want me to.
It appears that bloodbeard benefited the most from this townfolk death.
I don't know whether to file this as newbish or extremely scummy. The only thing I have to gain from Pandars death is votes on me. Pandar threw very few suspicions on me while I threw alot on him.
I think that is everything...
OH, and i'm pretty sure that at least 1 dopp is lying low, so yeah, speak up guys!
Another giant wall of text brought you to the bloody bearded one.