Woah, first post in a while... Haven't checked this board since two day's ago and over 250 replies in that space of time.... Just finished reading the 250 replies and while I agree on Forsaken being suspicious. I do not agree with you webadict or you pandarsenic that Bloodbeard and Toonyman are scum. The way in which Toonyman baited josh and then changed his mind on the reveal, seemed very real. And no offense toonyman, I don't see you pulling it off as scum.
Even if Toonyman were to attempt something like that. What reason would he have? All it does is draw attention to himself and josh, him or his scumbuddy will likely be the target of investigationings as we saw. And eventually the end result is a fail. Very risky.
The whole thing with org investigating chaoticjosh made it very obvious he was scum. Org of all people, would not fake claim as disciple of truth to target a townie who already has a vote bandwagon against him. Saying someone is scum via inspection with the end result of them being lynched as not scum, will quickly get you lynched. It would be fruitless for scum to do that.
Thus FoSing all those who tried to defend CJ and were suspicious of Org.
UnvoteRight, interesting turn of events.
I have to say I'm actually suspicious of Org and ToonyMan more than CJ, but for some reason I have always liked Josh, so I dunno...
Anyway, does anyone have one of those 'If you were [role] who would you [action] and why?' for me?
FoS: KashyykI'm not trying to be a 'voice of reason' nor am I accusing you or anyone else. My entire point is that this situation is more complex than it seems. You, for example, have reacted suspiciously several times and seem to constantly deflect to others any time someone hints that you may be accused, even if they don't actually accuse you of anything.
As for FoS due to my not voting CJ, that doesn't even make sense. It's hardly a foregone conclusion because a few people have decided to trust Org. Are you saying we should blindly follow any roleclaim that pops up? If Org is to be trusted then CJ's on roleclaim to toony was false, and that by itself makes me suspect the entire mess.
Either way, CJ may be guilty and he may not. I'm not ready to weigh in against him, but I have not decided he is town. I'm not sure I really understand your second post, as I'm in no danger of being lynched currently so what would be my motivation?
FoS: Foresaken1111Now to move on with the scum hunt. At this point there must be a scum in the mix of all these accusations. With the main finger pointers being Pandarsenic, Webadict, Foresaken1111, Bloodbeard and toonyman. As I said before I don't believe it is Toonyman.
My current position on Webadict and Bloodbeard stands as both are townies and are going at each others throats while the scum stand back and watch. Bloodbeards newness to the game seems to fit his playing style, and I feel we are too eager to jump on him. Webadict has an inflated ego, just because he was successful in picking chaoticjosh as scum and his previous lucky choices in previous games. I don't understand webadict's choice this time, it is almost as if he picked someone random, gunned for them to get lynched. If he were lucky and picked scum, he would gain even more scum picking kudos and everyone would continue to fawn over him as the scum-huntmaster. If he choose wrong, oh well, sometimes mistakes are made, webadict is still an awesome huntress.
This being said, although I don't like webadicts play still I don't think he is scum. He is just a glory hunter. Pandarsenic and forsaken however, I do think are scum. Pandarsenic went after forsaken after the lynch of CJ and what it revealed. This was a preemptive strike at him, so that if a bandwagon would form, nobody would consider him busing. However when a bandwagon never formed, (I don't know why, forsaken deserved a bandwagon for how he defending CJ), pandarsenic backed off his scum buddy. Saying this:
I still say Forsaken needs to die.
If you aren't accusing me of anything, why did you post this? I'd like to know exactly what I did to deserve such blatant hostility.
I was far more certain earlier than I am now. If my top suspects (Josh [confirmed], Toony, and BloodBeard) are all scum, that means there's one left; if you're the 4th scum, that means every scum is an active poster and I sincerely doubt the scumteam wouldn't have at least one member trying to lay relatively low, posting enough to be noticed but not enough to be seen.
Also adding to the scummyness is the halfhearted argument between pandarsenic and foresaken1111. They are attacking each other, but attacking without any real argument.
Therefore I am going to vote
Pandarsenic, and tomorrow if I am right we can take out forsaken1111.