Wow webadict, there's more holes in your arguement then swiss cheese.
Oh no! My baseless accusations!
Bloodbeard, acceptable answers would've been 2 townies, Webadict, or "Hopefully not me."
I'm afraid I have to vote you, Bloodbeard.
Very good arguement, so good that ten thousand people stood up in my defense that your question and conclusion means nothing. I don't recall you arguing their disagreement, unless you call:
I do what I want.
an argument.
Then there's:
I'd have him kill either Bloodbeard or Chaoticjosh because I think one or both are scum, and the EA has to rid themselves of both teams to win.
Bloodbeard was trying to side with ToonyMan, giving him an outward town appearance.
So, FoS Bloodbeard. I'll FoS you some other time Xegeth, because you're not nearly suspicious enough to be special.
So, all the other people who voted for josh, who we were all right in doing, were bandwagoning and defending Toony?
It's chaoticjosh. And Bloodbeard.
Again, no reason given.
Why do you keep suspecting me of being scum Web? You're bringing it up multiple times without giving any reasons why. I'd like an explaination.
If you're lying Org I will kill you. Unvote, vote Chaoticjosh.
Remember guys, this doesn't clear Org. They could have seen that Josh was likely to be lynched and as a way to try and clear him have Org claim Disciple of Truth.
Could but doesn't.
I'm telling everyone right now, I'm pretty sure you're scum.
And again.
The scum speaks the truth. However, the scum wouldn't want us to continuing to scumhunt if he knew that his earlier posts would help to identify his partners. I'll be backlogging to see if I can find any clues.
Shut up scumface.
I'm sensing a pattern.
Josh: You, BloodBeard, Toony.
I find it odd that the three people you choose include the exposed scum and the two people mainly responsible for putting the pressure on Josh and getting people to vote for him. FoS Panda, unless you can give some reasons behind your choices.
Shut up Scumface.
Okay, how about this list:
Chaoticjosh
Bloodbeard
Frelock
Maybe:
Kashyyk
Those top three right there are people I'm almost positive are scum. The maybe isn't completely sure, because I'm iffy on it.
So, AWV, kill Bloodbeard. Warden, block Frelock. Investigate Kashyyk if you feel like it. I don't really care about that right now.
These are all your accusations that i'm scum, pardon me if they look baseless.
You mean me, right? Why don't you just say that it's all my idea, and save everyone else some crap. Yeah, I'm saying you're scum. Big whoop, right?
I believe I did say that you started it. I thought you were just trying to guage my reaction like you did vector (granted, vector turned out to be scum but you didn't know that.), however this sudden outburst of defense against me not even accusing you of being scum has changed my mind.
Let's check this one out. First, you vote for chaoticjosh as soon as the opportunity presents itself, which is a common scumtell. You also unvoted someone who voted you in an OMGUS way, which is a scumtell, and then switched to Josh with no reason whatsoever.
Now this is where your arguement really starts to fall apart. Apparently it's a scumtell for people to vote for people who show sucpicious behaviour. Doesn't anybody else think I was bandwagoning when Josh got all nervous and lashed out at Toony? Since you think I was bandwagoning, why didn't you accuse all the other people who voted for him? Oh that's right, your arguement of "He is scum! Don't question me!".
Toony unvoted suddenly and tried to rally people to not vote for Josh. Just because I happen to pick up on this before anyone else means that my decision to change votes was baseless? You didn't find this sucpicious?
As for the "OMGUS", you seem to be forgetting Josh's behaviour. Do you think it would have been better to persist on someone who wasn't going to reply for hours rather then pressure someone who is obviously cracking under the pressure? Your arguement makes no sense.
The whole game is about starting something. Stop trying to be a bystander that is too cautious to do anything. That's also a scumtell. Being cautious.
Pardon me if I don't believe that lurking is a good judgement of scumminess. There are all sorts of reasons why people might not be online and I want to make it clear that that's my opinion.
With that said, I vote that
Webadict is scum. Your desperation and flawed arguement is a clear indication that you have no idea what you're talking about and attempting to rally people against me through your reputation.