Quick summary - A popular radio show here in Australia was well known for pulling stunts and shocking interviews. A few weeks ago, one interview involved a 14 year old girl who was strapped to a lie detector and questioned about her wagging school and sex life by her mother. She came out with the revelation that she'd been raped 2 years previously. The show was then suspended.
http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s2644599.htm(Mediawatch coverage of the matter and a bit of a profile of the kind of shit these guys pulled)
Now, I'm not usually one for moral outrage but...
holy shit guys. This is the biggest judgment trainwreck I've seen in a long, long time ("underaged girl forced against her will to answer personal questions live on air asked by her clearly near-negligent mother? WHAT CAN GO WRONG?").
Firstly, the rape issue -
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25889422-662,00.html. This was the unexpected worst case scenario that occured and it quickly became the heart of the matter for suitably retarded reasons. Rape is bad and traumatic, I'm sure having your mother (quite possibly intentionally) prod you on live radio untill you admit to being raped is not exactly going to help all the trauma. Yet as usual, media lets it become the absoloute heart of the matter, as opposed to what I feel is probably the far worse part of the girl's predicament - that her mother admitted to knowing about it and yet
still forced her to do the part and still probed her about her sex life. On live radio.. I have tried but been unable to find any mention of child services getting involved here, only the police who have now left the matter alone at the request of the girl.
Clearly the radio station staff were idiots, in every sense. That no-one even had the decency to pull the segment when the girl was claiming "I'm scared this isn't fair" speaks for itself, no-one there should be in any position of responsibility again and the organizers should be hit with the full extent of the law. There's this thing about teenagers, how they're all emotionally unstable and almost, to a person, insecure etc. I've said words to the effect a few times now but with this in mind, it was fucking abuse! *Longwinded, increasingly angry rant omitted*
As the mediawatch link so well points out, this kind of stunt is(was) pulled off quite a bit on the show, though usually with far less explosive results. Humiliation and suffering are great attention-grabbers and the show is aimed at the younger, stupider demographics who eat it up happily.
So... I know I had some discussion points here somewhere but in my vitriol I've gone and forgotten them.
How could anyone get on a popular radio show and still be so retarded to think this could in any way turn out well? In order to stop this kind of thing, tighter controls on media in general would be needed. While it would be nice to get fuckers like this out of their jobs pre-emptivley before they go and cause long-lasting damage to anyone, this would inhibit quite a number of other, less negative freedoms. Think this case and others like it should just be shrugged off as 'well, I don't listen to that crap, why should I care?"
Also, try to avoid witty one-liners. They're (occasionally) witty but mostly just derail. Not saying you can't, but unless it's a golden gem from valhalla that just fell in your lap, maybe they'd serve their purpose elsewhere.