Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Mr.Person]

Although, if Mr.Person were to change his vote instead of Webadict.  Then he would die from his lover being killed instead of one of us having to kill him.

I checked with Org. Not only does getting elf'd take precedence over suicide, becoming an elf completely overrides the suicide.

[Eduren]

Do I vote Pandar or not?

[ToonyMan]

Do I vote Pandar or not?

Yes please.  The chance of Pandarsenic being an Elf is higher than Diakron being an Elf.

[ToonyMan]

Although, if Mr.Person were to change his vote instead of Webadict.  Then he would die from his lover being killed instead of one of us having to kill him.

I checked with Org. Not only does getting elf'd take precedence over suicide, becoming an elf completely overrides the suicide.

Alright, then I guess Webadict will be our noble sacrifice.

[Eduren]

Pandarsenic.

[Mr.Person]

Problem: Diakron exposed the Hammerer, so we can't protect him when the Druid immediately goes after him.

Explain why I'm the Druid, by the way?

Doesn't matter, we're at 6p right now. We lynch one player, we go to 5p. I suicide, we go to 4p. Hammerer nones. We have 2 players vote for Pandarsenic, one of whom is the hammerer. Then, we either win that turn or the hammerer hammers the last possible elf player and we tie. It's foolproof. There's no chance of failure as long as we don't lynch stupidly. Since I'm clear, ToonyMan is clear, and pretty much everybody else is clear in one way or another, the only elf choices left are Pandarsenic and Diakron. That's why I encourage everybody to lynch Diakron first, in case he's a regular old elf getting info from Pandarsenic the evil elf druid.

We don't need to "sacrifice" somebody, we can make it a draw or win for everybody instead of a win or loss for one person.

[webadict]

Problem: Diakron exposed the Hammerer, so we can't protect him when the Druid immediately goes after him.

Explain why I'm the Druid, by the way?

Doesn't matter, we're at 6p right now. We lynch one player, we go to 5p. I suicide, we go to 4p. Hammerer nones. We have 2 players vote for Pandarsenic, one of whom is the hammerer. Then, we either win that turn or the hammerer hammers the last possible elf player and we tie. It's foolproof. There's no chance of failure as long as we don't lynch stupidly. Since I'm clear, ToonyMan is clear, and pretty much everybody else is clear in one way or another, the only elf choices left are Pandarsenic and Diakron. That's why I encourage everybody to lynch Diakron first, in case he's a regular old elf getting info from Pandarsenic the evil elf druid.

We don't need to "sacrifice" somebody, we can make it a draw or win for everybody instead of a win or loss for one person.

That scenario HAS a sacrifice...

[ToonyMan]

Wait so.  There is three elves?  I've been playing this whole game like there was two.

[Mr.Person]

Wait so.  There is three elves?  I've been playing this whole game like there was two.

Oh, I thought we started with 11p, not 10. I suppose 3 elves would be pretty unlikely, yeah.

Problem: Diakron exposed the Hammerer, so we can't protect him when the Druid immediately goes after him.

Explain why I'm the Druid, by the way?

Doesn't matter, we're at 6p right now. We lynch one player, we go to 5p. I suicide, we go to 4p. Hammerer nones. We have 2 players vote for Pandarsenic, one of whom is the hammerer. Then, we either win that turn or the hammerer hammers the last possible elf player and we tie. It's foolproof. There's no chance of failure as long as we don't lynch stupidly. Since I'm clear, ToonyMan is clear, and pretty much everybody else is clear in one way or another, the only elf choices left are Pandarsenic and Diakron. That's why I encourage everybody to lynch Diakron first, in case he's a regular old elf getting info from Pandarsenic the evil elf druid.

We don't need to "sacrifice" somebody, we can make it a draw or win for everybody instead of a win or loss for one person.

That scenario HAS a sacrifice...

Wow, do I even read what I type? Fuck me, let's get on with it. Pandarsenic, if you would please not vote, we can make the game a lot more fun for everybody involved, mmmkay? If you're not scum, we promise to lynch Diakron tomorrow, ok?

[Mr.Person]

Actually, no, there would be no sacrifice. If anybody gets elf'd at 3p left, that player would get a draw. If anybody gets elf'd NOW, that player would lose, guaranteed. It's a small but decisive difference.

[Pandarsenic]

Also, if you cast the vote for the druid while the hammerer is still alive, you're guaranteed to lose. The only way to have a chance at winning while voting for the druid is to vote for said druid after the hammerer is killed...

[ToonyMan]

I'm fine with what it is right now.  PANDARSENIC IS THE DRUID.  ARRR.

>_>

[Pandarsenic]

This is true.

And I'm going to vote for Eduren, because unless you lynch him, you can't touch me without losing. So....

[ToonyMan]

Blarg.  I ain't falling for your bluff ELF.

[Pandarsenic]

Blarg.  I ain't falling for your bluff ELF.

Really? Let's see you vote for me instead of webadict then.