Really, Meph? Really? Either you're less...analytic (? can't think of the correct word) than I remember you being, or you're scum. You're pointing out WIFOM situations without commenting on the WIFOM (some put in play by webadict himself (my role)) and you're actually using them as the reasons for voting.
Also, I don't get your little thing about me being suspicious because I would be "afraid" of Pandar's role. His role was revealed a while ago. I had as much reason as anyone else (including you, but excluding Org I guess) to want to night-kill him. Was that you just being bad at trying to put WIFOM into play as scum, or are you suddenly "looser" in thought than I am?
And besides, if we're going off of abilities alone, I'd be suspicious of you. You were the only person who could have successfully voted to lynch Pandar (who was a townie), and your role doesn't seem to have any other point that I can see but to counter Pandar. Since the only way to day-kill a certain townie was from you (with an unknown alignment), that's some WIFOM related to a role for you, though it would be incredibly difficult (addressing this later on) and require a hell of a lot of trust from everyone... So I guess dismiss this point. >,>
My role is rather similar to Josh's Three Votes from last game which, as I recall, was a townie role. Speaking of Josh's Three Votes, I don't remember you being this suspicious of him last game. Why the sudden change in assessment of similar roles (my role will be, at most, if I am indeed scum as you claim, as powerful as his was)?
Also. Addressing some more WIFOM. Why would the mafia kill Pandar over me, when I would be able to more easily kill them? A) So that I can help kill an innocent. B) To bring this sort of WIFOM into the game. C) To get rid of the only person (correct?) who could not be lynched regularly, aside from the use of your role. Though for him to be lynched would require everyone else to abstain and for you to be the only person to vote and for you to vote for him. This would require certainty from everyone (except Org <.<) that he was scum over other options, and trust that you wouldn't change your vote at the last second.
I apologize if I come off as antagonistic with this post. Josh is rubbing off on me.
But aside from all that, it's good that Diakron was actually scum. I was doubting myself a little, thinking what I considered suspicious about him may just have been because he was a newbie to this sort of game. I was relieved when I read the day-end post.