Hes trying really hard not to FoS anyone.
And you're trying really hard to make basic analyses. Perhaps a bit more data would help substantiate your claim.
Well he was pretty quick to agree with people about me but all he said was "I agree!". Then he throws out his Org vote hoping to steer conversation away from himself.
Plus this is beginners mafia, get used to basic analysis.
Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.
No comment.
That was a well thought-out analysis. It doesn't have to be long, but it has to be more than, "I see you dislike voting."
The difference between this one, and your last one is that you actually tied two ideas together. And I will not get used to basic analysis. Perhaps you should get used to advanced analysis.
However, you forgot a piece.
webadict and eduren are scum. Easy.
Unvote.
Vote eduren.
He's going for the "easy" lynch. It's a scum tactic to lynch either a lurky or unhelpful townie that is obviously suspicious, instead of the harder to prove, but more likely suspects. Obviously, he can't bother to drag up information on me, and if he does, I will be able to defend myself much easier. He also chooses not to use any information in his post, and simply states an opinion without any relevant premises.
Yes, I think eduren is very suspicious, but what about the others that choose not to post too often like Org, dakarian, Bloodbeard, or Jim Groovester? Have we forgotten them because they were silent?
Blah blah blah. Nobody has proof on day 1.
We try to find proof. We don't do nothing.