Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ToonyMan]

What were the questions again?  I'm sorry.

[Eduren]

Hes trying really hard not to FoS anyone.

And you're trying really hard to make basic analyses. Perhaps a bit more data would help substantiate your claim.

Well he was pretty quick to agree with people about me but all he said was "I agree!". Then he throws out his Org vote hoping to steer conversation away from himself.

Plus this is beginners mafia, get used to basic analysis.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.

No comment.

[ToonyMan]

Haha, you scum dog you.

[Eduren]

Im sorry but once again, you are throwing out votes without backing them up.

[Eduren]

Rules question: Can a lynching happen in the middle of the day, or do we have the rest of it to change votes around?

[ToonyMan]

Blah blah blah.  Nobody has proof on day 1.

[Vector]

So... a question to eduren.  Why are you bringing up the post-reviewing warning?  Bringing that up in and of itself constitutes a comment--an incomprehensible one.

Also, fake-edit: that's not a vote.  That's casting aspersions on your character, which at this point looks pretty muddy.  I'm sorry, but you seem to be trying way too hard.  If you aren't scum, then what are you, and what are you attempting to protect?

[Free Beer]

What were the questions again?  I'm sorry.

The post is right there, on page 11:

Could you explain the previous grudge that led you to vote for Bloodbeard (and then quickly about face when called on it)? Also, why are you currently abstaining? And why are you simply dismissing any inquiries into your suspicious behavior? You might like the insanity of the mafia that you are currently running, but I consider this a serious game. No doubt others feel the same.

[Mephansteras]

Rules question: Can a lynching happen in the middle of the day, or do we have the rest of it to change votes around?

You have until the end of the day to switch around votes all you want. The only time I'll end a day early is if everyone has voted and it seems very unlikely that anyone is going to change.

I'm not sure I've ever done that, actually, but I reserve the right to.

[Eduren]

I believe Toonyman's actions constitute scum.

Oh and i was just pointing out that my post was already written by the time Toonyman voted for me. I had some good points and wanted people to understand that i saw Toonys vote before i posted it. The warning itself wasn't a comment rather a clarification.

[webadict]

Hes trying really hard not to FoS anyone.

And you're trying really hard to make basic analyses. Perhaps a bit more data would help substantiate your claim.

Well he was pretty quick to agree with people about me but all he said was "I agree!". Then he throws out his Org vote hoping to steer conversation away from himself.

Plus this is beginners mafia, get used to basic analysis.

Warning - while you were typing a new reply has been posted. You may wish to review your post.

No comment.

That was a well thought-out analysis. It doesn't have to be long, but it has to be more than, "I see you dislike voting."

The difference between this one, and your last one is that you actually tied two ideas together. And I will not get used to basic analysis. Perhaps you should get used to advanced analysis.

However, you forgot a piece.

webadict and eduren are scum.  Easy.

Unvote.

Vote eduren.

He's going for the "easy" lynch. It's a scum tactic to lynch either a lurky or unhelpful townie that is obviously suspicious, instead of the harder to prove, but more likely suspects. Obviously, he can't bother to drag up information on me, and if he does, I will be able to defend myself much easier. He also chooses not to use any information in his post, and simply states an opinion without any relevant premises.

Yes, I think eduren is very suspicious, but what about the others that choose not to post too often like Org, dakarian, Bloodbeard, or Jim Groovester? Have we forgotten them because they were silent?

Blah blah blah.  Nobody has proof on day 1.

We try to find proof. We don't do nothing.

[ToonyMan]

100% guaranteed now.  webadict and eduren are scum.  I don't care if you vote for me, they are scum.

What were the questions again?  I'm sorry.

The post is right there, on page 11:

Could you explain the previous grudge that led you to vote for Bloodbeard (and then quickly about face when called on it)? Also, why are you currently abstaining? And why are you simply dismissing any inquiries into your suspicious behavior? You might like the insanity of the mafia that you are currently running, but I consider this a serious game. No doubt others feel the same.

BloodBeard has a tournament thing and I lost.     Alot.  I'm town.  This is serious.

[Jim Groovester]

Herm. eduren makes several good points about ToonyMan, and they are both still acting suspicious. My vote for dakarian remains unchanged, however, for the reasons I stated in the last post. There's still time to make a more official decision about them later.

Yes, I think eduren is very suspicious, but what about the others that choose not to post too often like Org, dakarian, Bloodbeard, or Jim Groovester? Have we forgotten them because they were silent?

I would say I'm posting frequently enough to say I haven't been silent. Not everybody likes posting when they don't have anything to announce or anything constructive to add to the dialogue.

The way you frequently highlight suspicion over everyone.... I can't decide if you're a townie trying to be genuinely helpful or scum trying to throw us all into chaos with your experience.

[Eduren]

I don't know anyone here so I can't weigh in on webadicts motivations however Toonymans behavior has gone from jokingly nonchalant to panicked and desperate.

He cannot provide evidence of his claims against I nor Web and unless he can, i believe him to be scum.

[Free Beer]

100% guaranteed now.  webadict and eduren are scum.  I don't care if you vote for me, they are scum.

What were the questions again?  I'm sorry.

The post is right there, on page 11:

Could you explain the previous grudge that led you to vote for Bloodbeard (and then quickly about face when called on it)? Also, why are you currently abstaining? And why are you simply dismissing any inquiries into your suspicious behavior? You might like the insanity of the mafia that you are currently running, but I consider this a serious game. No doubt others feel the same.

BloodBeard has a tournament thing and I lost.     Alot.  I'm town.  This is serious.

Good. We're making progress. Can you please tell us all what you were trying to do before, ignoring or dismissing anyone who questioned or suspected you? I'm pretty sure it confused the heck out of everyone else in the thread.