Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

14 (60.9%)

No

8 (34.8%)

Other (explain)

1 (4.3%)

Total Members Voted: 23

[webadict]

Are you implying something about yourself, Webadict?

Not in the least. Why would you ask such a thing?

[Servant Corps]

Honestly? I'm tired of this game. Tired of waiting, tired of posting, tired of scumhunting.

I am thinking that we should all agree to vote No Lynch perpetually until the Cultist kills again on the assumption that the Cultist was blocked. If the Cultist kills again, then we go back to lynch mode. If the Cultist gets blocked three times in a row, we win, and this game can finally, FINALLY end.

[Frelock]

Well, I was in favor of a no lynch to begin with, though with Kashyyk's recent absence things might be worse.  However, I agree with SC about forcing the scum to kill before we do him the favor.

No Lynch

[Mephansteras]

Considering the sheer amount of inaction this game is getting right now, I think I'll put it to a vote. If everyone wants to just call it done and move to a new round, I'll be fine with that.

Edit: Poll has been reset. Note that if our scum decides that he's excited by the idea of trying to win even against these odds, I'll keep the game going. But if he's also bored, and the majority of players would rather start over, I'll end this round and we can start prepping for the next.

[inaluct]

Hmm, I will vote inaluct again for the same reasons I had yesterday.
Also if anyone has a blocking role (Psychic warden), they should come forth and claim who they blocked as that person is the most likely scum member.

Would you mind restating those? I don't feel like wading back through more than 5 pages to find them.

[webadict]

Considering the sheer amount of inaction this game is getting right now, I think I'll put it to a vote. If everyone wants to just call it done and move to a new round, I'll be fine with that.

Edit: Poll has been reset. Note that if our scum decides that he's excited by the idea of trying to win even against these odds, I'll keep the game going. But if he's also bored, and the majority of players would rather start over, I'll end this round and we can start prepping for the next.

I think it's just the number of players in the game is considerably greater than the original games. Having games of 20 people makes it so impossible to keep track of who's done what at whatever point for whatever reason.

I think we should limit players in our games to a certain max.

[Pandarsenic]

If Scum doesn't want to continue, let's just move on....

[Org]

If Scum doesn't want to continue, let's just move on....

The dead agrees with this one...
Or atleast I do.

[Cheeetar]

I don't want to end it. We were so close .

[webadict]

I don't want to end it. We were so close .

That's why we want it to end.

[Cheeetar]

Because we all hate winning?

[webadict]

Because we all hate winning?

If you want to keep playing through Days of scumhunting... When there's so many people.

[Cheeetar]

Because we're all lazy sods who want instant rewards?

[webadict]

Because we're all lazy sods who want instant rewards?

...No. It's because everyone is so inactive that this game is ridiculous. Lurking runs rampant... Scum's probably Kashyyk, seeing as how he didn't log in for the past week.

[Mr.Person]

I know I'm dead, but I just want to point out that 12 people voted yes on the poll at the time I posted this. Also, since I haven't used my one "After death" message, here it is. Wait, not this one, it suc