Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

14 (60.9%)

No

8 (34.8%)

Other (explain)

1 (4.3%)

Total Members Voted: 23

[Servant Corps]

I think the Cultist realized something.

The more people he kill, the higher the odds it will be for him to be random-lynched.

Luckily, the rules prohibit "Everyone Lives Happily Ever After". Kasyyk, who did you investigate?

[Frelock]

I'm curious if anyone has a reason other than a smart cultist that would explain the no-kill (ie, a Psychic Warden blocking the scum, a Protector protecting the right person (which, of course, clears them from being scum).  Naturally, don't post it here if you're the one who did such a thing, but, if there is a PW right now, I suggest blocking the same person for the next 2 days, to see if there's still no kill (scum can only no-kill two days in a row, so a no-kill for 3 days while blocking the same person confirms them as scum).  If there's a protector out there, keep guessing right .

[EchoP]

I think the Cultist realized something.

The more people he kill, the higher the odds it will be for him to be random-lynched.

Luckily, the rules prohibit "Everyone Lives Happily Ever After". Kasyyk, who did you investigate?

But he has to kill everyone to win? So he should be killing regardless of the odds.

[Cheeetar]

Frelock, is it just me, or did you edit your post very shortly after posting it to make it look like you were unsure if someone protected Kashyyk?

I FoS Frelock.

[Frelock]

No, I did not edit it.  I simply went through both possibilities which I mentioned.

And how would you know if someone protected Kashyyk?

[Cheeetar]

What I meant to say was, you looked as if you were sure of if Kashyyk was protected or not. Only the protector, possibly Kashyyk and the scum who attacked would know, and the post which I thought was pre-edited seemed pretty sure that Kashyyk was protected and attacked by scum.

[webadict]

This is rather simple, isn't it?

We can do one of two options:

1) If whatever happened to stop the scum was something that can be redone, we should No Lynch. A No Lynch followed by 2 more Days of No Kills will cause the scum to INSTA-LOSE.
2) Continue lynching.

I, honestly, think we should do number 2, but I'll go for number 1 if someone finds a viable reason (Or Kashyyk has a better answer?)

Besides, I think I knows what happened.

[Pandarsenic]

If it's working and we hit our protector or roleblocker, scum gets to kill again.

[EchoP]

Also, I would suggest hitting lurkers tonight if we want to lynch. There is a possibility there was no night kill because they did not submit their night actions.

[webadict]

Also, I would suggest hitting lurkers tonight if we want to lynch. There is a possibility there was no night kill because they did not submit their night actions.

I doubt it, but I want Kashyyk to tell us what results he got.

[Mephansteras]

The Whiteboard
The whiteboard is empty



Reminder, Day 4 ends tomorrow at ~10am Pacific.

I think this is the slowest day we've ever had. Are people just bored with this round now that most of the scum are dead?

[webadict]

Vote Twiggie then. This is stupid, and I wish games were smaller.

[A_Fey_Dwarf]

Hmm, I will vote inaluct again for the same reasons I had yesterday.
Also if anyone has a blocking role (Psychic warden), they should come forth and claim who they blocked as that person is the most likely scum member.

[webadict]

Hmm, I will vote inaluct again for the same reasons I had yesterday.
Also if anyone has a blocking role (Psychic warden), they should come forth and claim who they blocked as that person is the most likely scum member.

I'm pretty sure it was a Doctor.

With doctor abilities. And doctor tools. And doctor skills.

Dooooooooctor.

[Frelock]

Are you implying something about yourself, Webadict?