Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7

Author Topic: Nuclear fusion  (Read 7421 times)

Twiggie

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #60 on: June 18, 2009, 11:47:47 am »

yeah. because we have enough mass right here on earth to build a dyson sphere.
Logged

Yanlin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Legendary comedian.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #61 on: June 18, 2009, 05:31:09 pm »

Who said we have to use the earth?
Logged
WE NEED A SLOGAN!

Nilocy

  • Bay Watcher
  • Queen of a Community.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #62 on: June 18, 2009, 06:09:47 pm »

Who said we have to use the earth?

The moon. Its fairly reflective and not to mention in the sunlight all the time.
Logged

Twiggie

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #63 on: June 18, 2009, 06:11:40 pm »

uh, we're talking about masses several times that of earth. which isnt really going to be helped by the moon. we'd have to drag in asteroids from the kuiper belt in order to get enough

[/pretending i know what im talking about]
Logged

Rilder

  • Bay Watcher
  • Rye Elder
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #64 on: June 18, 2009, 07:29:54 pm »

uh, we're talking about masses several times that of earth. which isnt really going to be helped by the moon. we'd have to drag in asteroids from the kuiper belt in order to get enough

[/pretending i know what im talking about]

Yeah, slinging asteroids in Earths general direction is an AWESOME IDEA!
Logged
Steam Profile
Youtube(Let's Plays), Occasional Streaming
It felt a bit like a movie in which two stoners try to steal a military helicopter

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #65 on: June 18, 2009, 08:27:39 pm »

All of this Dyson Sphere/asteroid redirecting stuff is up for serious consideration.
Logged
Shoes...

sneakey pete

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #66 on: June 19, 2009, 12:10:07 am »

You are underestimating the impact, expense and impracticality of solar panels.
 Unless you are suggesting roof-mounted nuclear generators. Then please, go on ahead.

And your trying to say that its more practical to launch them into space instead?
Logged
Magma is overrated.

Yanlin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Legendary comedian.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #67 on: June 19, 2009, 01:28:29 am »

uh, we're talking about masses several times that of earth. which isnt really going to be helped by the moon. we'd have to drag in asteroids from the kuiper belt in order to get enough

[/pretending i know what im talking about]

Who said we have to use the earth?

Seriously. We got the moon, an unimaginable supply of asteroids, (Talking about more than 9001 trillion tons. Way more.) About half the moons in the solar system, some of the far off planets...

Sure it's not enough for a Dyson sphere. But it's enough to satisfy our energy needs for about as long as we'll be humans.
Logged
WE NEED A SLOGAN!

umiman

  • Bay Watcher
  • Voice Fetishist
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #68 on: June 19, 2009, 03:57:53 am »

That's like saying no one on earth could possibly need more than 15mb of ram.

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #69 on: June 19, 2009, 06:05:38 am »

Now, now. Who's talking about what kind of Dyson's Sphere?
The original(Dyson's) idea of myriad, separate, sun-orbiting satelites with a habitat and a solar panel attached?
Or the uber-cool-but-physically-unlikely solid Dyson's Sphere like in e.g. "Blame!" comic book?
Logged

Yanlin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Legendary comedian.
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #70 on: June 19, 2009, 06:57:57 am »

That's like saying no one on earth could possibly need more than 15mb of ram.

Except we're talking about something along the lines of a few hundred yottabytes of RAM.

In case you don't know, a yottabye is 10^24 bytes.
Logged
WE NEED A SLOGAN!

Twiggie

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #71 on: June 19, 2009, 10:33:46 am »

at the end of the day, however much we generate will encourage people to use that much. and then they'll want more. so its best just to stick with not generating too much energy.
Logged

PTTG??

  • Bay Watcher
  • Kringrus! Babak crulurg tingra!
    • View Profile
    • http://www.nowherepublishing.com
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #72 on: June 19, 2009, 10:52:34 am »

I thought the ability to burn through any substance known to man would be helpful in taking down plastics and unrecyclables.
...

It is, and has already been done. They have these power plants that can take literally everything, burn it with an electrical arc much like a continuous lightning strike, and recover enough from the atomized remains to generate net energy. The only outputs are "syngas" (carbon monoxide, hydrogen, and helium) and chunks of slightly radioactive obsidian. The heat is enough to take practically any molecule and reduce it to atoms, so any toxin or hazardous waste other than dangerous elements can be destroyed without effort.
Logged
A thousand million pool balls made from precious metals, covered in beef stock.

umiman

  • Bay Watcher
  • Voice Fetishist
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #73 on: June 19, 2009, 11:27:47 am »

Yanlin: If you can make it, they can use it. It's not too difficult. There's no limit on human energy use, just a limit on imagination or the ability to think beyond one's current usage.

JoshuaFH

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Nuclear fusion
« Reply #74 on: June 19, 2009, 12:09:45 pm »

Topics like this clearly show that I don't pay enough attention to the General Discussion board. I'm really interested in Nuclear stuff, but it's too bad I'm too dimwitted in the subject to discuss it.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7