Nuke, some CRAZY FRICKING STUFF is happening that can't be explained with normal logic: WA marching off to his doom, and Pandar pulling giant lies out of nowhere for no reason.
You're right, some crazy stuff is happening. I haven't found a consistent pattern that explains all the behavior yet, which is irritating. I hope I can by tonight.
To everyone else, me being scum doesn't match up with the voting patterns. Why would I suddenly protect CJ, after trying so hard to get him lynched two days in a row. If I were scum, detecting Nuke as a seeker with the goal of 'find' on night one would probably lead to the mafia night killing him night two. But that didn't happen did it? CJ contacted him knowing he was a protector on night 3, this shows that I did scan you. He even proved Nuke as Medium with the help of panda. This was supposed to help the town. Now look what it has done. Nuke, you are splitting the town apart. If I am lynched, the town will be short a telepath and it's doppelganger finding abilities.
You're right, lynching a town telepath, in general, would be bad. Nuke is right, though, that if you are a town telepath, then chaoticjosh is a town enchanter, and his dopp win scenario is impossible. Similarly, if you are a dopp telepath then chaoticjosh is a dopp (probably) enchanter, but we're at 7 people/2 dopps tomorrow and can pull off a lynch against him. Lynching you will either confirm chaoticjosh or prevent us from losing, whereas lynching Frelock will either kill a dopp or make us lose.
As for reasons: We already know that webadict and Alexhans were scum. If chaoticjosh is scum as well, that puts three very experienced players on the scum side. Who knows what plans they have for inserting dopps into the town base? I'll also note (despite chaoticjosh claiming his voting record irrelevant) that every vote he was in has been enough to push over a victory even without his enchanter vote. If I were a dopp, I'd feel reasonably comfortable pushing for my own people's lynch if I knew that there was an margin for error on the voting.
And, since I'm feeling analytical...
Day one you hopped around a bit on random votes, were agreed with by Alexhans and webadict (though not for suspicious things), and finally settled on chaoticjosh at Alexhans's suggestion, with very little explanation.
Day Two you accused chaoticjosh of a delayed OMGUS vote, and claimed he was scummy for voting for me. No other posts.
Certainly, voting for chaoticjosh. Not much pushing though.
And, though I'm sort of sorry about it, Nuke's analysis is quite persuasive: If we lynch you, we learn if chaoticjosh and nuke are dopps or not, and avoid a town loss. If we lynch frelock, we learn about the strength of chaoticjosh's hunches and lose if they are wrong. I'm going to vote
A_Fey_Dwarf again.
What I would suggest, though, is putting up the people you have scanned the past three nights and your suspicions. That way, if you are town we can use them even after your death. We'll have to trust in our native scumhunting abilities, true, but that seems better than trusting our fate to chaoticjosh at the moment.