Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.
Some time later, I return to the thread, see this, and say:
Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.
Hmmn. Ok, but how is that useful? Why drop in to say just that? It seems like something you might say if you were a dopp/exterminator who attacked someone, only to kill twiggie instead, whilst you vainly hoped they would be protecting chaoticjosh.
-might- say. Please respond to clarify why you thought it was important.
He doesn't respond for a while, and I decide to put some more emphasis on the question by voting:
For my obligatory random vote, I'm going to vote R1ck- Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.
Hmmn. Ok, but how is that useful? Why drop in to say just that? It seems like something you might say if you were a dopp/exterminator who attacked someone, only to kill twiggie instead, whilst you vainly hoped they would be protecting chaoticjosh.
-might- say. Please respond to clarify why you thought it was important.
A while later, R1ck comes in, says this:
I'm going to give into the pressure to vote, and vote for Chaoticjosh. My reason is because of his voting patterns on day 1. As soon as he saw the Twiggie bandwagon starting to form, he jumped on and voted right after nuke voted for twiggie, and he also urged other people to vote for twiggie. Later, when he saw that the twiggie bandwagon was dying off, he voted for nuke, who TheToeBighter had already voted for, probably in an attempt to dispose of a strong scumhunter early in the game. After he saw that nobody else was going to vote for nuke, he switched to voting for toebighter, who was then lynched.
Huh? So, he, like, jumps the chaoticjosh bandwagon (4th/3rd on (rysith unvoted before this post)), with, admitedly, an explanation, but missed/ignored my questions. I pointed this out:
I'm going to give into the pressure to vote, and vote for Chaoticjosh. My reason is because of his voting patterns on day 1. As soon as he saw the Twiggie bandwagon starting to form, he jumped on and voted right after nuke voted for twiggie, and he also urged other people to vote for twiggie. Later, when he saw that the twiggie bandwagon was dying off, he voted for nuke, who TheToeBighter had already voted for, probably in an attempt to dispose of a strong scumhunter early in the game. After he saw that nobody else was going to vote for nuke, he switched to voting for toebighter, who was then lynched.
Ok, cool.
Now could you reply to my accusation?
To which he replied:
Your accusation that I tried to kill whoever twiggie was guarding last night? What defense can I give? I don't think there's any way to prove my innocence to you without giving valuable information to the dopps.
I quoted myself for easy reference at that point:
For my obligatory random vote, I'm going to vote R1ck- Well, I think that we can probably rule out chaoticjosh as the one that Twiggie defended, since Twiggie did vote for him yesterday.
Hmmn. Ok, but how is that useful? Why drop in to say just that? It seems like something you might say if you were a dopp/exterminator who attacked someone, only to kill twiggie instead, whilst you vainly hoped they would be protecting chaoticjosh.
-might- say. Please respond to clarify why you thought it was important.
Which he has also ignored. Ok, he hasn't posted since. But still.
Think about it.
Author
Topic: Paranormal Mafia - Round 6 - Game Over (Read 66901 times)