Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Servant Corps]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallout:_New_Vegas

Start the whine engine.

[Okenido]

Old news.

[Servant Corps]

Gotcha. I just found out though and I didn't know there was a thread on it.

[Deon]

"It will be the same sort of role-playing game experience seen in Fallout 3."

It terrifies me. Fallout 3 was a shooter with elements of RPG. I mean, seriously. They could come up with much better improved GURPS after so long time of it's existance.

[Haven]

On the other hand, it does happen to be Obsidian doing the dev work... Some hope, at least.

[Dr. Johbson]

"It will be the same sort of role-playing game experience seen in Fallout 3."

It terrifies me. Fallout 3 was a shooter with elements of RPG. I mean, seriously. They could come up with much better improved GURPS after so long time of it's existance.

Completely agree. Had barely any quests, too. I am not looking forward to when/how Bethesda kills TES5. I loved Morrowind, the oldest one I played, it was an amazing game. Oblivion was great, don't get me wrong..But it wasn't anything like Morrowind. But now I play Oblivion with more then 150 mods, and I like it much more. 

Err, back on topic. Fallout 3- average game, Fallout 4- Lets hope for the best?

[Yanlin]

My senses tell me that Fallout 4 is going to be decent. Maybe even good.

[Deon]

With mods.

Fallout 3 features too simple RPG system for me. I like personalizing/planning my character, it's one of the most important things in RPG for me. Fallout 3 didn't have a lot of real "options" for that.

[Tilla]

My hopes are slightly higher just based on the fact that it's Obsidian - aka one of the studios founded by the Black Isle guys after the Interplay collapse. So it has Fallout1/2 designers on board

[Virtz]

Why's this topic called Fallout 4, yet links to a wiki article about a spin-off/expansion? Am I missing something here?

[Servant Corps]

Because, while Bethesthda is stating that it is a spin-off/expansion, I am believing it to be a sequel, hence why I started the topic of Fallout 4.

[Virtz]

Because, while Bethesthda is stating that it is a spin-off/expansion, I am believing it to be a sequel, hence why I started the topic of Fallout 4.

I rather doubt Bethesda/Zenimax would allow a different company to create an official sequel after the last one was so financially successful.

I realize such cases are not unheard of. Bioware pulled such a stunt twice (with Obsidian at that). But somehow I find it easier to imagine Zenimax suing itself over intellectual property damage than allowing someone else to make an official sequel to a currently popular franchise and risk having the popularity die down.

[Muz]

Because, while Bethesthda is stating that it is a spin-off/expansion, I am believing it to be a sequel, hence why I started the topic of Fallout 4.

I rather doubt Bethesda/Zenimax would allow a different company to create an official sequel after the last one was so financially successful.

Then.. the franchise is ruined

A pity, I rather liked the old Fallout. It's not looking back with rose-tinted glasses either, I actually play Fallout 2 all over again when the nostalgia hits me and end up loving it as much every time. Well, there's always new franchises. Like DF. I'm so going to write a hate thread on DF 3 in the future once it gets sold to EA.

[Okenido]

I believe you mean Slaves to Armok 3: [Secondary Title].

[Servant Corps]

No, he means Slaves to Armok 5: [Secondary Title].