...and as we were, with our cluttering liberal-vs-leftist squabble in the 3.19 thread...
Because that would be the dogmatic effect. The CCS couldn't attack the nuclear plant because that would be attacking conservative nuclear power. The LCS couldn't attack PBS because that would be attacking public radio. Likewise while the CCS might pull of the counterfeit scheme, the LCS shouldn't because that would be supporting the conservative agenda! Attacks in these games are done against either the conservative or liberal establishment.
Fiat currency, the Federal Reserve, state managed money supply, these are all VERY liberal concepts. Their absence would be arch conservative. It doesn't matter what the hell your motive is, attacking these institutions is no less conservative then it would be liberal to slander religion.
Right, exactly! Likewise, as due process and rule of law are VERY liberal concepts, it doesn't matter what the hell your motive is, vigilantism is supporting the conservative agenda!
...right?
And printing fake money is done to attack the structural support for fiat currency.
...and here I thought you were saying it was to induce chaos.
No, you were saying that it was about inducing chaos. I was saying something more important was at stake.
If you wish to accuse me of misguided Conservative thought, be my guest. But please be fair and accurate. I discussed using counterfeiting for the very pointed purpose of inducing inflation to reduce the value of debt and wealth held by corporations.
You were the one who introduced such phrases as "creating economic anarchy" and "chaos inducing". I can't see how my "disrupt the corporatist system" turn-of-phrase can reasonably be taken to be synonymous with "induce chaos" without some fairly strong unstated assumptions.
Every argument you are given could equally be used to explain why the LCS would launch an attack on NPR. Yes, NPR might be broadcasting news that isn't liberal. Attacking NPR can create chaos that helps the liberal cause and might stick it to the man. However NPR is a part of the liberal establishment. Therefore attacking NPR would be an inherently conservative action. This is why the LCS can no more attack NPR then the CCS can attack conservative media.
And every argument you've given against counterfeiting as a form of Liberal Activism could be used equally to explain why the LCS can't own guns or engage in political violence. Private gun ownership is fundamentally conservative; therefore, the LCS cannot do it regardless of their motives, because the means to whatever Liberal end they're pursuing would then be fundamentally Conservative... right? Suppressing free speech is fundamentally Conservative; therefore, the LCS cannot attack Conservative media outlets regardless of their motives? I'm sorry, I can't possibly see an argument that LCS means to Liberal ends must be ideologically pure could possibly hope to be taken seriously.
Finally, I'd point out that I'm not sure I'd be willing to credit rejection of fiat currency as being arch-conservative. I really don't think it is, according to the definition of arch-conservative presented by LCS. Clamoring for a return to commodity currency is something most often heard on the right coming from fringe far-right libertarians and PMD fundamentalists. Fiat currency is a well-established tradition in American capitalism. Corporations don't want to see it gone. Movement conservatives looking for a strong, right-wing US government don't want to see it gone. The ones who want to see it gone don't want to see it gone because they're devoted to movement conservatism, they want to see it gone because of the doctrines of their particular brand of libertarianism or Christianity. They want to see it gone
in spite of their Conservative leanings, not because of them. Remember, right-wing is no more equivalent to Conservative than left-wing is to Liberal, even in the over-the-top caricatures presented by LCS. Heedless conflation leads to needless confusion.