Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 88 89 [90] 91 92 ... 370

Author Topic: Atheists  (Read 405567 times)

Jackrabbit

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1335 on: September 09, 2009, 06:18:45 am »

How does my fascist great-grandfather keep being right about these things?
Logged

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1336 on: September 09, 2009, 09:51:38 am »

Quote
Read Cracked lately? There's a summer camp for atheists just like for other beliefs apparently. Supposedly it's a camp to encourage free thought, but personally, I think it'll just turn out batches of "hard" atheists.
It's not.  It's a standard summer camp that also happens to teach critical thinking.  You may say "It's the same thing" but I do a Critical Thinking course (it's free and is only one hour a week.  Why not?) and they certainly aren't steering us that way.  They do canoeing, music and arts and crafts at Campquest too, but I suppose that doesn't fit into the image of a radical atheist camp.
Logged

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1337 on: September 09, 2009, 12:14:06 pm »

Funny how that works. Even when somebody has something like an Atheist Radio, or whatever, everyone automatically assumes it's some sort of mirror-universe version of a Fundie Radio. Same goes for atheist/bible camp.
Logged

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1338 on: September 09, 2009, 01:43:26 pm »

Funny how that works. Even when somebody has something like an Atheist Radio, or whatever, everyone automatically assumes it's some sort of mirror-universe version of a Fundie Radio. Same goes for atheist/bible camp.

I also found it funny that it's somehow portrayed that Atheists like the Obama administration...  ::)  Give me a true Libertarian any day over that mess.
Logged
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1339 on: September 09, 2009, 01:55:01 pm »

Funny how that works. Even when somebody has something like an Atheist Radio, or whatever, everyone automatically assumes it's some sort of mirror-universe version of a Fundie Radio. Same goes for atheist/bible camp.


There are indoctrination-based atheist camps? Weird. Never heard of that one.

I understand a bible camp, because you're trying to indoctrinate someone into some particular culture with a ton of qualities ascribed to it. "Atheism" is pretty far from a culture in itself. Hell, it's hardly really anything on its own.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==

Muz

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1340 on: September 09, 2009, 02:09:34 pm »

"Teaching them to think critically" sounds like a different way to say "indoctrination". Really, just think about it.
Logged
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1341 on: September 09, 2009, 02:12:39 pm »

"Teaching them to think critically" sounds like a different way to say "indoctrination". Really, just think about it.
And you're having a kneejerk reaction.  "Think critically" is basically "Don't believe everything you hear".  Which is a strange gambit for an "Indoctrination" to make.  If it causes a child to question past indoctrination then yes, I guess it might have changed their views, but they are never told that there isn't a God, or even that there probably isn't one.
Logged

Muz

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1342 on: September 09, 2009, 02:54:30 pm »

You saw what I did there? No edits :P

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Logged
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.

G-Flex

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1343 on: September 09, 2009, 03:32:38 pm »

Not really. The only way I'd really consider it indoctrination is if they specifically lead kids to believe there are no gods. If they teach the kids to think critically, and one of them uses that approach to determine that there's some sort of god, then they shouldn't discourage that.
Logged
There are 2 types of people in the world: Those who understand hexadecimal, and those who don't.
Visit the #Bay12Games IRC channel on NewNet
== Human Renovation: My Deus Ex mod/fan patch (v1.30, updated 5/31/2012) ==

Leafsnail

  • Bay Watcher
  • A single snail can make a world go extinct.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1344 on: September 09, 2009, 03:48:03 pm »

Quote
It's just as indoctrinating as giving kids a book, saying it's about some guy in the past, and telling them to read it.
Have you ever tried this?  Giving a child a bible and telling them to read it is a surefire way of turning them off religion (worked for me, anyway).  They need to tell children it's true, that Jesus loves them, that it will save them, that it's true some more, that the Bible is the ultimate word of God, and so on.

Wheras simply teaching someone the skills for being critical of any old book that's shoved in front of you is not indoctrination.  It's the giving of an important life skill (how well, for instance, would you do as a judge without critical thinking?  What about as a historian?  A scientist?  A journalist?).
Logged

Jualin

  • Bay Watcher
  • What's that sound?
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1345 on: September 09, 2009, 03:58:10 pm »

Don't mind me, just a speed-bump in the road.

This has probably been stated before. There's probably already an counter-arguement, counter-counter-arguement, critique, critical analysis, dissertation, and doctoral paper on the exact same statement as the one I present here, but I'm not going through 90-odd pages of religious debate. Not a chance. I'm just bringing this here and leaving.

Spoiler: !WARNING: RANT AHEAD! (click to show/hide)
Logged

Andir

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1346 on: September 09, 2009, 05:09:55 pm »

I do not advocate unrestricted expression. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness must be "shelved" in some way or another when it prevents another from possessing any of those three. Sometimes, when the interference extends to all three, the responsible individual must face all three of theirs being "shelved" as well.
Whoa now! This is a very strange statement...  Who determines who gives up that which makes them happy, free, or living for someone else?

Because this could be construed as pure communism.

If Bill over here bought the last TV, should Franky have to just deal with the fact there there are no more or should Bill be forced to share?
If Bill over here bought the last of this food product, should Franky have to just deal with the fact there there are no more or should Bill be forced to share?
If Bill over here bought the last gallon of gas, should Franky have to just deal with the fact there there are no more or should Bill be forced to share?
If Bill over here got the last job, should Franky have to just deal with the fact there there are no more or should Bill be forced to share?

Here in the US, we are given the right to pursue Life, Liberty, and Happiness, not the privilege to have it given to us.  This competition is what keeps the economy alive and progressive.  If I could just sit on my ass all day and watch TV while someone else slaves away in a factory you better believe I'm warming up that couch.

This is all a matter of resources.  There are only so many resources in this world.  You cannot possibly divide up the country into perfect sections for people to live on.  Who gets the privilege of lake shore property?  I mean, everyone has a right to it.  Should we dig lakes at the border of everyone's land?  I could go on on this topic, but hopefully you can see my point.

This is how I read your statement.  You think it's a responsibility of everyone to make everyone else happy... everyone gets a slice of pie, even the person that didn't help cook it.
Logged
"Having faith" that the bridge will not fall, implies that the bridge itself isn't that trustworthy. It's not that different from "I pray that the bridge will hold my weight."

Ampersand

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1347 on: September 09, 2009, 05:20:18 pm »

If I tell a bunch of children who have never been out doors that the sky is blue without evidence, I have indoctrinated them. Is it bad in this case, because I have provided them with true information?

I don't care whether or not Christians are indoctrinating their children. If they are right, then they are absolutely doing the right thing.

That is why I'm not going into a debate about whether or not the practices of Christianity are good or bad, it depends ENTIRELY on whether or not it's true. I'm willing to have that debate.
Logged
!!&!!

LegoLord

  • Bay Watcher
  • Can you see it now?
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1348 on: September 09, 2009, 05:27:58 pm »

Andir, the rights of life and liberty are guaranteed (as Jualin stated).  We don't have to pursue them.  That's why slavery and murder are illegal.  The thing we have only a right to pursue is happiness. (as Jualin did in fact say). He made no mention of guaranteed happiness that I saw.  He was talking about how your rights only go as far as they can without restricting the rights of others.  For example, your right to punch things ends where damage begins; you can punch a punching bag all you want, but if you punch a person, you better have a good reason.  This is a fairly standard practice amongst modern governments, not communism.

That is why I'm not going into a debate about whether or not the practices of Christianity are good or bad, it depends ENTIRELY on whether or not it's true. I'm willing to have that debate.
Which is impossible, because while we can't say it's true you can't just say it's all false either.  So there really shouldn't be any debates on religion to begin with.
Logged
"Oh look there is a dragon my clothes might burn let me take them off and only wear steel plate."
And this is how tinned food was invented.
Alternately: The Brick Testament. It's a really fun look at what the bible would look like if interpreted literally. With Legos.
Just so I remember

Ampersand

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #1349 on: September 09, 2009, 05:38:06 pm »

I fundamentally disagree. We can demonstrate that there the foundations of religions rely on faulty arguments, and unsupported claims, without any evidence provided. I can claim that invisible intangible fairies exist, which cannot be shown to not exist, but that doesn't make me right, that doesn't make my belief in those fairies valid.

We may not be able to disprove the existence of these entities, but I can prove that a persons belief in such things is not justified.
Logged
!!&!!
Pages: 1 ... 88 89 [90] 91 92 ... 370