If Intelligent design is a scientific theory, how come it is never published in a peer reviewed article? How come there aren't any experiments to see if it's true? With evolution at least, we can test the hypothesis? Can
you devise an
experiment that tests the ID hypothesis? Thought experiments don't count, it has to be scientific lab work, like this one:
http://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/The E. Coli ongoing evolution experiment, that has been going on for 20 years, and has already showed signs of evolution, including an E. Coli strain that can live off nitric acid.
And this:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/275/5308/1934Which observes the rate of evolution, and even measures it. Can you measure Intelligent Design?
Plus this:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.htmlWhich is a record of observed instances when a new species has emerged, supporting evolution.
In fact, there hasn't been a proper scientific paper challenging evolution in a hundred years. There is no controversy, and if you do prove an intelligent designer, then you are eligible for a Nobel Prize. Arguments are not proof, we need evidence, and we need tests, and the tests so far, are in favor of evolution.
And two more videos for the heck of it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSgKen Miller, a Christian against Intelligent Design (Just watch the first hour, second is just Q&A)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnJX68ELbAYAaronRa, showing the flaws with creationism and intelligent design. (part of a series)