I included the word wiser, and human construct. And I believe you're none the wiser than our forefathers, nor less human.
Then you have redefined the meaning of that word to suit your own views.
No, I expanded the God's traits with the OTHER words that were in the sentence.
And I don't need any to believe in him
Actually yes, you do. Otherwise you're believing something for no reason, which is just stupid.
We were talking about evidence, so I'd be believing in him without evidence. Which is about the definition of belief: accepting something as true without evidence. I have a reason that I mentioned numerous times in this topic. No need to use words like "stupid" here. We're all trying hard to keep this thread unlocked.
Um, a subjective objective meaning is just as much nonsense as black white or round square.
No. There's just no absolute absolute, so all absolutes are subjective absolutes. If you absolutely believe otherwise, that's your absolute reality. Yes, that is right, we don't share a reality. You may believe we do, I believe we don't, still belief vs belief. Hitting me in the face won't change that, you may be an illusion as well as the pain. There is no evidence for a reality. That is why science
assumes there is, so it can work from there.
....eeeexcept when that 'other' happens to be God.
Meh, I don't really care what he thinks of me, since I have no way of knowing. The purpose-story is not about self-worth, it's about purpose. And I don't get my self-worth from purpose either.
And offending me by calling me stupid is a whole lot worse than by making a point
. No really, I'd love to hear your point. What do YOU believe in, Sordid? What is your worldview, your paradigm, your stance on reality and the universe?