Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 320 321 [322] 323 324 ... 370

Author Topic: Atheists  (Read 404149 times)

FuzzyZergling

  • Bay Watcher
  • Zergin' erry day.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4815 on: October 05, 2010, 08:39:10 pm »

Maybe cats just like making faces in mirrors.
Or, it could be that this is the first time its seen itself, and it thinks "OMG my hair is like not the way I want it at all!"
Logged

alway

  • Bay Watcher
  • 🏳️‍⚧️
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4816 on: October 05, 2010, 09:29:18 pm »

Ah! This is the fundamental misunderstanding. The point isn't that we can learn what a reflection is, the point is that we can recognize that its actions mimic our own perfectly and thus surmise that it is, in some way, based on us; a creature that is not self-aware couldn't recognize the concept of itself and so that could not occur to it. It would only have thought processes for interacting with the world around it, and it just would never occur to consider itself as a thing it could interact with. It doesn't understand that it exists, only that it perceives (if you see what I mean; it's a very strange point and difficult to express, but it's key to the whole thing). Can anyone more eloquent than me sum it up, or is this actually something I've made up on my own that has no real philosophical grounding?
Yep, that's the general idea of it. The idea being that without a somewhat abstract sense of one's own existence, one can not figure out that thing in the mirror is indeed somehow related to or a part of themself. Without such an abstract notion of one's own existence, the creature's reasoning would go something along the lines of "pattern recognized -> suprised looking cat -> defend territory from cat" rather than "pattern recognized -> person who does the same actions I do -> I am a person -> the person in the mirror is probably me."
Logged

Flaede

  • Bay Watcher
  • Beware the Moon Creatures.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4817 on: October 05, 2010, 10:05:46 pm »

The trouble is, that to pass the mirror test, they also need to display that they grasp this, in a way that the researchers can also recognize. Assumptions are sometimes made about how "airtight" the researchers' schemes are for setting up that second bit.
Logged
Toady typically doesn't do things by half measures.  As evidenced by turning "make hauling work better" into "implement mine carts with physics".
There are many issues with this statement.
[/quote]

Micro102

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4818 on: October 06, 2010, 12:31:54 am »

Hmmm. Maybe they can try replacing the mirror with a picture in which the "other cat" is now gone?
Logged

Muz

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4819 on: October 06, 2010, 01:23:33 am »

The funny thing is that "knowing" how light functions, what if some situation caused it to function not as expected, and someone looking in the mirror ceased to see themselves? That person would be clawing, hissing, and screaming at the mirror.
Logged
Disclaimer: Any sarcasm in my posts will not be mentioned as that would ruin the purpose. It is assumed that the reader is intelligent enough to tell the difference between what is sarcasm and what is not.

Siquo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Procedurally generated
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4820 on: October 06, 2010, 04:53:25 am »

I think the issue is that you are a step behind us. You're talking about the hypothesis, how all hypothesis' have merits. From my understanding, we're talking about Theories. Evidence and experiments designed to test the hypothesis.

Otherwise, you're insane.
Perhaps, but insanity is subjective. I'm meta-ing just one step further: I question the hypothesis that evidence and experiments are proof to some kind of truth. But that irks a lot of people here, and indeed, I'm the only one doing that :)

On-topic: Still, the mirror test depends on communication: we interpret the hissing of a cat as "he thinks that's another cat and not himself". Putting a superintelligent rock in front of a mirror would not give us any results, even though the rock might be thinking "that mirror is a really crude item, as it only reflects a small band of electromagnetic radiation, and those apes carrying me around are so damn stupid, I don't believe they're intelligent."

Also, vampires fail the mirror test. Perhaps cats do too, as they identify other cats and themselves mostly by smell, not by sight.

Comic relief: Hmmm. If you make a large floor-to-ceiling mirror, would a vampire run into it because he can't see that it's a mirror?
Logged

This one thread is mine. MIIIIINE!!! And it will remain a happy, friendly, encouraging place, whether you lot like it or not. 
will rena,eme sique to sique sxds-- siquo if sucessufil
(cant spel siqou a. every speling looks wroing (hate this))

Heron TSG

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Seal Goddess
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4821 on: October 06, 2010, 07:45:52 am »

More on topic, what kind of advice do you have for when people say 'god bless you' when you sneeze and you don't believe in a god? What do you say?
Logged

Est Sularus Oth Mithas
The Artist Formerly Known as Barbarossa TSG

Siquo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Procedurally generated
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4822 on: October 06, 2010, 07:55:48 am »

You could try "Thanks."

It's like when an american asks you "How are you", even though he's not interested in the answer at all, in fact you're not even supposed to answer at all, or if you do, in a superlative positive single word ("Great!", "Fantastic!"). You shouldn't take it too literal.

Or, if you're like me, you should take this harmless little opportunity to start arguing about the universe and nothing.  :D
Logged

This one thread is mine. MIIIIINE!!! And it will remain a happy, friendly, encouraging place, whether you lot like it or not. 
will rena,eme sique to sique sxds-- siquo if sucessufil
(cant spel siqou a. every speling looks wroing (hate this))

Osmosis Jones

  • Bay Watcher
  • Now with 100% more rotation!
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4823 on: October 06, 2010, 08:12:41 am »

More on topic, what kind of advice do you have for when people say 'god bless you' when you sneeze and you don't believe in a god? What do you say?

"Why the hell would a giant drunk space monkey bless me for nasally expelling mucus?"

"No I don't"

"Argghhhh it burns, it buuuurrrrrnnnnnnnnssss"

or just hiss like a snake, it's always a classic.
Logged
The Marx generator will produce Engels-waves which should allow the inherently unstable isotope of Leninium to undergo a rapid Stalinisation in mere trockoseconds.

Shades

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4824 on: October 06, 2010, 08:24:25 am »

I question the hypothesis that evidence and experiments are proof to some kind of truth. But that irks a lot of people here, and indeed, I'm the only one doing that :)

Your missing the point then, evidence and experiments are not attempting to prove a kind of truth they are attempting to forfill the burden of proof towards whatever the hypothesis was. At a certain point you can call it 'truth' or 'fact' when it is fundamentally unlikely for it to be another way however you always leave room open for it to be disproved so it's not a proof of truth. Which goes back to the things are only ever disproven concept.

More on topic, what kind of advice do you have for when people say 'god bless you' when you sneeze and you don't believe in a god? What do you say?

Depends on the person saying it. Most people say it without believe in a god so it's clearly just an automatic nicety. If the person says it with a certain conviction then maybe I'll question it but generally it is still just a automatic response.
Logged
Its like playing god with sentient legos. - They Got Leader
[Dwarf Fortress] plays like a dizzyingly complex hybrid of Dungeon Keeper and The Sims, if all your little people were manic-depressive alcoholics. - tv tropes
You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right. - xkcd

Siquo

  • Bay Watcher
  • Procedurally generated
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4825 on: October 06, 2010, 08:48:25 am »

I know how science works, but I personally question the merits of science in search of truth.

That is: even if science disproves something, I can still comfortably believe that it's true, as I don't believe the concept of "disproven according to scientific principle" holds any measure of any definition of truth beyond the scope of the scientific model the disproof was created in. Science is internally correct (as are most nonsensical beliefs, btw) but holds no real value externally, for me. The experience that science does "get things done" is, to me, equivalent to the statement that "prayer sometimes works", just a lot more frequent :)
Logged

This one thread is mine. MIIIIINE!!! And it will remain a happy, friendly, encouraging place, whether you lot like it or not. 
will rena,eme sique to sique sxds-- siquo if sucessufil
(cant spel siqou a. every speling looks wroing (hate this))

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4826 on: October 06, 2010, 08:55:00 am »

You're a hypocrite then.
Unless you never entrusted your life to a scientifically proven concept, like e.g. got on a plane, or drove a car, or boiled some water(how do you know it won't just explode?).
Logged

Josephus

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Immortal Historian
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4827 on: October 06, 2010, 09:01:26 am »

Smaller and smaller circles. This argument makes me HNNNNNNNNNGH
Logged
Solar Rangers: Suggestion Game in SPAAAAACE
RPG Interest Check Thread
i had the elves bring me two tigermen, although i forgot to let them out of the cage and they died : ( i was sad : (

Shades

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4828 on: October 06, 2010, 09:03:10 am »

If something is disproved then there is a real life case that shows the hypothesis in question cannot hold. I don't see how you can argue that is still does (and actually believe what you say).

Like the hypothesis the earth is flat for example, easily disproved as you don't fall off the edge, therefore the earth is not flat. Unless of course you don't believe that things that happen actually happen in which case we are in the realm of being unable or unwilling to face reality, which is a whole different kettle of fish.

Disprove is easier than proof. Proving a hypothesis is effectively impossible, the best we can do is say it holds for now.

Logged
Its like playing god with sentient legos. - They Got Leader
[Dwarf Fortress] plays like a dizzyingly complex hybrid of Dungeon Keeper and The Sims, if all your little people were manic-depressive alcoholics. - tv tropes
You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right. - xkcd

Medicine Man

  • Bay Watcher
  • Pile the bodies, set them aflame.
    • View Profile
Re: Atheists
« Reply #4829 on: October 06, 2010, 09:04:40 am »

Smaller and smaller circles. This argument makes me HNNNNNNNNNGH
The argument makes you make a grunting sound that some people make when they're taking a dump?
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 320 321 [322] 323 324 ... 370