Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: Anencaphaly child  (Read 8709 times)

Daft

  • Bay Watcher
  • Enthusiastic but Incompetent.
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #45 on: April 25, 2009, 07:27:10 pm »

Well, I have read about several cases in which dogs have become mayor. I wish I could find a link, though.  :-\
Logged

The Mad Engineer

  • Bay Watcher
  • Tock.
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #46 on: April 25, 2009, 08:36:27 pm »

If we could grow a brain for it, then it wouldn't matter.

Killing it now would simply remove the flesh-case for the mind.  The mother can always make a new one.  If you were to give it a brain, you wouldn't be transferring its now-dormant soul to a new mind.  You would be giving it a new one.

Besides, the mother might not like the idea of humanity using science to create a soul for her baby.  She might argue that the practices used to obtain that knowledge was unethical, or that we would be going against "God" in doing so.

Armok

  • Bay Watcher
  • God of Blood
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #47 on: April 25, 2009, 08:49:37 pm »

That things should be killed dead, there is nothing useful you can do whit it...
Not true. It can run for a public office.
+10 points!  :D
Logged
So says Armok, God of blood.
Sszsszssoo...
Sszsszssaaayysss...
III...

inaluct

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #48 on: April 25, 2009, 09:01:03 pm »

Okay, upon actually reading that blog, I have come to the conclusion that the mother of Faith Hope (or whatever) is mentally unstable. She was clearly driven insane by learning that her child was mindless.

She writes and acts like the baby is capable of higher brain function! Listen to this;

Quote from: insane, grief stricken mother
Yum yumm! In case some of you didn't know... Faith is actually capable of taking milk by mouth. In fact, she went without a tube for the first 25 days of her life. A tube feed was inserted when she lost too much weight as a result of not getting enough milk (it takes more effort for her to coordinated her sucking and swallowing and she tired before getting enough).
Ugh. She thinks that her little orc monster even can make an effort. It's horrible.

This woman should either be killed or committed to an asylum. It isn't safe for people like this to run free in our streets.
Logged

Emnar

  • Bay Watcher
  • Losing is fun...I should know!
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #49 on: April 26, 2009, 12:58:10 am »

I look at it like this:

From what we know, the brain (and brain stem and to some degree the spine) is the center of, and contains the data for, your personality.

Your brain can theoretically be removed from your body, and if kept alive and given a means to communicate, your personality will still be intact.  Certainly, it's a popular science fiction trope.

I would not consider myself or any other person dead if they were surviving as a "brain-in-a-vat."  I suspect this view would be widely shared.

This baby is the opposite case, or nearly so (it doesn't lack the entire brain apparatus, just most of it).  So therefore, I would not consider it conscious or sentient, and therefore no more "alive" than a viable kidney removed from a cadaver for transplant.

This also nullifies the "what if we can grow a brain in the future" argument.  If we could, that would be nice, and maybe in this mother's case we would.  But it would be no different ethically than letting the body containing the damaged brain die, then cloning it, while fixing or preventing whatever caused the problem in the first place.

I think we can all agree that this is a sad case, and that it's another great example of how life is full of -- to quote one of my favorite philosophers -- "some fucked up repugnant shit."
Logged

612DwarfAvenue

  • Bay Watcher
  • Voice actor.
    • View Profile
    • TESnexus profile, has my voice acting portfolio.
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #50 on: April 26, 2009, 02:40:59 am »

That baby is a living thing. It pumps blood, it breathes, etc., but it's useless. I fully agree that if a kid's got a severe mental disorder or something really bad, and theres no hope of the child getting any better, then they should be euthenized (sp?).

Did you hear about that girl that refused a heart transplant? It's her choice, and it's most likely for the best.

Just my 2 cents.
Logged
My voice acting portfolio.
Centration. Similar to Spacestation 13, but in 3D and first-person. Sounds damn awesome.
NanoTrasen Exploratory Team: SS13 in DF.

Cyx

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #51 on: April 26, 2009, 07:45:36 am »

I would not consider myself or any other person dead if they were surviving as a "brain-in-a-vat."  I suspect this view would be widely shared.

This baby is the opposite case, or nearly so (it doesn't lack the entire brain apparatus, just most of it).  So therefore, I would not consider it conscious or sentient, and therefore no more "alive" than a viable kidney removed from a cadaver for transplant.

This also nullifies the "what if we can grow a brain in the future" argument.  If we could, that would be nice, and maybe in this mother's case we would.  But it would be no different ethically than letting the body containing the damaged brain die, then cloning it, while fixing or preventing whatever caused the problem in the first place.

I think we can all agree that this is a sad case, and that it's another great example of how life is full of -- to quote one of my favorite philosophers -- "some fucked up repugnant shit."

This thing sure acts like some kind of big useless plant, but I don't see what the big deal about that is. Plants don't feel anything, yet no one wants to kill them out of mercy. And plants are alive, too. Doesn't look like she's gonna waste a lot of resources either, just sitting there being fed by tubes*. I really wouldn't mind if she was euthanized but I find it strange that everyone thinks it's some kind of crime against Nature. "Obviously these people are under demonic forces and need prayer and serious help. They don't realize it, but they are truly puppets of satan."...
The mother should be killed, though.

*Apparently yes ? Well it would be a reason to kill her, but we've seen worse I guess.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2009, 08:08:56 am by Cyx »
Logged

DJ

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #52 on: April 26, 2009, 09:04:45 am »

The problem is that all the medical resources put into her could be used for babies that actually have a chance for a normal life.
Logged
Urist, President has immigrated to your fortress!
Urist, President mandates the Dwarven Bill of Rights.

Cue magma.
Ah, the Magma Carta...

Yanlin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Legendary comedian.
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #53 on: April 26, 2009, 09:18:10 am »

Seriously. Religious people are the people who don't THINK.

Their whole faith contradicts itself in every possible term and lacks evidence.

Not to mention they don't follow the scientific method. They draw conclusions and seek proof.

(The scientific method finds proof/evidence and draws conclusions based on that.)

The problem is that all the medical resources put into her could be used for babies that actually have a chance for a normal life.

Also true.
Logged
WE NEED A SLOGAN!

pokute

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #54 on: April 26, 2009, 09:31:13 am »

Ah yes, the vaunted higher brain functions.

Is your consciousness the holy grail of cognitive brain development?
Or a distracting byproduct of your subconscious?
Logged
If history wasn't written by the victors, humanity's failures would be self-evident.

The Doctor

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #55 on: April 26, 2009, 10:49:56 am »

Well, you just typed that with your consciousness.

Sooo yeah.

Logged

Yanlin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Legendary comedian.
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2009, 10:53:20 am »

Being unconscious is not fun.
Logged
WE NEED A SLOGAN!

Cyx

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #57 on: April 26, 2009, 11:03:42 am »

The problem is that all the medical resources put into her could be used for babies that actually have a chance for a normal life.

True, I didn't think of that at first. The time and money used to make bombs and fancy cars could save babies too, that's what I meant by "we've seen worse"; at least they are trying to preserve a life. I realize it's just theoretical though, while the medications used on the baby could actually save a few others.
Logged

pokute

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #58 on: April 26, 2009, 11:31:31 am »

Well, you just typed that with your consciousness.

Sooo yeah.

Your consciousness is not what you believe it to be.
Logged
If history wasn't written by the victors, humanity's failures would be self-evident.

Nilocy

  • Bay Watcher
  • Queen of a Community.
    • View Profile
Re: Anencaphaly child
« Reply #59 on: April 26, 2009, 05:59:00 pm »

When it comes down to it, conciousness was a nessiscary evolution by our ancestors to survive. This baby and her mother just happen to be one of the extremely unfortunate ones. So yeah, derailing the convo again.

But seriously, you lot have no right to say whats good or not for this child and neither do I.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2009, 06:02:28 pm by Nilocy »
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6