Sigh. People need to smarten up and realize this:
We exist only to make more of ourselves. Biology-wise, as soon as we do, we can die happy. We have served our purpose.
But somewhere along these lines, we decided to make our lives better. Then we started liking life. So we decided to live more. That's the oversimplified jist of it. While I can't say the development of humanity has been a mistake... I can say that this baby is not going to serve its biological purpose. It will forever be a waste of resources and time.
Not to mention that keeping something alive just because you can is wrong. The woman said it herself. Let god decide when she dies. Yet she puts it on life support? If anything, further proof how flawed religion is. This is not an isolated incident, as Epicurus has shown us. These religious dregs, whenever asked to think, supply blind faith. "Because god said so."
Yes. I used to be like that. Then I thought and became an Atheist.
But anyway, back to the topic.
I can understand why she wants to keep it alive. It's the motherly instinct. It existed back when the risk of losing a child was extremely high and was not affordable. Every child was too expensive to lose. It was a must have to propagate our species. Unfortunately, we evolved too fast for this instinct to fade away. Nowdays, it's a waste to keep the bad ones. They should not be kept. You will be making their life miserable as well as useless.
Back to religion, technically, this baby has no soul. So she might as well slaughter it and put it on an alter or something.