Heh. Two posts, and goin' hot.
First of all: There is a big difference between God, who knows everything, and everyone here, who is limited to their respective (and diverse) perceptions. Maybe this is all big one play and we're just playin' our parts in a monstrous (as in size, not in quality) script. To the individual, this
appears to be free-will. Heck, in order to get away from this perception, you have to
leave the space-time we currently occupy. The point is, even if we are predestined to do certain things, we still have the perception of free-will. We have choices.
@Shoruke: I don't think anybody here is arguing with you on the omniscient part. In addition, why is it God's responsibility to fix our problems (since we, ourselves, are responsible for where we are at)? Why is it so hard to believe, now, that he came 2000 years ago?
I'll accept the fact that you don't believe that Jesus and the Bible are telling the truth. There are a couple of things I'd like to point out though:
1. Yeah, God is enigmatic, but the problem is on our side rather than his: i.e. incomplete information. It's not really his problem if we don't understand him. As a matter of fact, he even states that we will not understand him. If you're looking for understanding before faith, you're drawing water from a dry well.
"The point is, that god would save us a LOT of negative emotion if..."
2. ...is not necessarily true.
There is still the problem of faith, and of the principle of 'bad things happen to both good and bad people.' So God shows up every five years. You're still gonna feel horrible if your wife is raped and then murdered, your kids run away, the government hounds you at every corner, your friends rub salt in your wounds (metaphorically), and to top it all off, you've got a raging cold, a high fever, and a runny nose. You're still gonna feel bad if, despite these glorious appearances and the feverish faith running rampant through the cities of this world, you still don't believe in God for whatever reason. You're still gonna feel bad if you belong to a differant belief group. You're still gonna feel bad if your land and possessions are taken away (against your own will), by God's ordinance, and given to somebody else.
[tl;dr]: Even if God does come back as you suggest, it's not going to cure the 'negetive emotion running amok.' Humanity will simply find something else to complain about (probably focussing its ire on God himself).3. The debate for Global Warming is not over. Especially Man-Made Global Warming (debate in another thread please). Pick other examples (such as nuclear annihilation of the entire planet) that are less politically hot please.
4. God is not gonna stop us from shooting ourselves (collectively and individually) in the foot('global warming,' per your example), especially if A) We don't believe in him and B) We don't want to have anything to do with him. Furthermore, he's not going to unless we
ask him. And for that to happen, you
have to believe in him. Yes, he is a benevolent and loving God, but I believe that the proper description of the relationship between him and humanity is: "a lover(God) scorned." AND THAT IS NOT TO IMPLY IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM THAT HUMANITY AND GOD ARE LOVERS... in the physical sense, that is.
I may have to edit that last paragraph given further thought.
@IWM: I dunno 'bout you, but all the history I have read does not point to a God that 'plays' with his creation. But then again, maybe you're being facetious.
@Jude: Heh. I believe that to be an unsupported statement.
@Gorjo: "yeah, i think I was thinking a little more abstractly than I was typing, or maybe vice-versa."
I understand completely.
Umm. I'm going to contend with you on this point: "He quit doing that..." God is as involved today as he was 2000 years ago, maybe more so. And, indeed, God has no trouble getting directly involved.
@Servant Corps: My apologies, then. I did not intend to step on your nerves. I'll go back and edit that last post.
And..... I think that's it for this post.
-(e)EP