I was told to write a story today... and I had an irresistable urge to write the whole thing in announcements messages...
I actually did this. The teacher praised me for "letting the reader imagine the story themselves."
As cool as that sounds, this teacher is what is wrong with the education system. I mean, if you were told to paint a picture, and turned in a blank canvas and paint supplies at the end of the week, would you still earn praise? Although strictly speaking, that's a modern art sculpture. And that's what's wrong with modern art.
I get what you're saying, Nikov, but in this case, the "artist" did make a big contribution of "input". The idea about the blank canvas and the paint supplies, while being a strong statement, I for one wouldn't qualify as
art. The "announcement" story, on the other hand, I find to be rather avant-garde.
All art is open to interpretation by the viewer--that's part of it's purpose. In this case, it's just more open than others. Not a bad thing, I feel.
In art, I consider the level of contribution of the artist to be the most deciding factor on what is, and isn't, worthy of the name. For example: An artist who presents a dollar bill and calls it "found modern art" is just being lazy. The same artist who
draws a perfect duplicate of a dollar bill, and then presents it as a work of art, would in my opinion, be a real modern artist (and a counterfeiter ofcourse, but what can you do?). The same goes for, say, a Campbell's Soup can. Ofcourse, I'm referencing Andy Warhol here.