Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6

Author Topic: BC vs BCE  (Read 8948 times)

Alexhans

  • Bay Watcher
  • This is toodamn shortto write something meaningful
    • View Profile
    • Osteopatia y Neurotonia
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #60 on: February 03, 2009, 04:13:30 pm »
what about AB standing for "After Bill" (Meaning Bill Gates, of course).  It would probably make him happier enough to lower the price of Windows 0.05 % for the future release.
Logged
“Eight years was awesome and I was famous and I was powerful" - George W. Bush.

Darkone

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #61 on: February 03, 2009, 08:39:59 pm »
First of all: Whats the fucking point? Why waste effort on a stupid, completely unrequired change?

Second...
Quote from: Keiseth on February 03, 2009, 03:23:27 pm
Or we could all just use the Julian Date, if it bothers us that much. We're from the Bay 12 forums, we like complicated things.

No, we should base our system on imaginary numbers. Just to make peoples heads explode every time yo uask "Whats today's date?".
Logged
Quote from: Serg on December 19, 2008, 05:38:29 pm
"LOL, those nub FBI, they thought you were sharing software so they kicked down your door, only to find you recently wiped your entire hard drive, how wacky! Case dismissed."
Quote
[11:58] <Jay16> I couldn't begin proper last time I tried this because I embarked next to a hydra.

Cthulhu

  • Bay Watcher
  • A squid
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #62 on: February 03, 2009, 08:50:20 pm »
Quote from: Alexhans on February 03, 2009, 04:13:30 pm
what about AB standing for "After Bill" (Meaning Bill Gates, of course).  It would probably make him happier enough to lower the price of Windows 0.05 % for the future release.


I, for one, think Bill Gates rules, and thinks the other OSs can go sit at Starbucks and write their screenplays and try to be eclectic.

Also, I heard about BCE and CE in seventh grade.  I'm a senior now and I think I've seen dates referred to as such maybe twice.
« Last Edit: February 03, 2009, 08:51:53 pm by Cthulhu »
Logged
Shoes...

Wooty

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #63 on: February 03, 2009, 08:52:43 pm »
We should use the Star Trek "stardate" system. Every day we make up a completely random number from 2000-80000 and that's today's date.
Logged
Quote from: Toady One
It's important to wear lots of face paint while you program. And you can type with your long Gene Simmons tongue.

Jude

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #64 on: February 03, 2009, 09:03:11 pm »
Quote from: Cthulhu on February 03, 2009, 08:50:20 pm
and thinks the other OSs can go sit at Starbucks and write their screenplays and try to be eclectic.


lmaooooooooo so true
Logged
Quote from: Raphite1
I once started with a dwarf that was "belarded by great hanging sacks of fat."

Oh Jesus

Duke 2.0

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CONQUISTADOR:BIRD]
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #65 on: February 03, 2009, 09:42:26 pm »
Quote from: Cthulhu on February 03, 2009, 08:50:20 pm
I, for one, think Bill Gates rules, and thinks the other OSs can go sit at Starbucks and write their screenplays, type up novels they will never complete, talk to other Mac users on just how awesome their OS is in comparison to others and try to be eclectic.

 Finished that for you.

 I say we base the next two-thousand on a religious figure of today. Now lets see, what is the most popular religion that popped up in the last hundred yea-

 Oh crap, we are going to base our new date system on Tom Cruises death.
Logged
Quote from: Aqizzar on October 13, 2010, 04:19:47 am
Buck up friendo, we're all on the level here.
Quote from: Jim Groovester on August 08, 2010, 08:18:09 pm
I would bet money Andrew has edited things retroactively, except I can't prove anything because it was edited retroactively.
MIERDO MILLAS DE VIBORAS FURIOSAS PARA ESTRANGULARTE MUERTO

Strife26

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #66 on: February 03, 2009, 09:44:58 pm »
But he isn't dead yet.  ???

How are we supposed to get our dating system if he isn't dead? Unless, he is a zombie?
Logged
Even the avatars expire eventually.

Duke 2.0

  • Bay Watcher
  • [CONQUISTADOR:BIRD]
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #67 on: February 03, 2009, 09:46:36 pm »
 When he does kick the bucket, the year after will be known as 1 AC. That is, unless somebody can make a Latin version of of it.
Logged
Quote from: Aqizzar on October 13, 2010, 04:19:47 am
Buck up friendo, we're all on the level here.
Quote from: Jim Groovester on August 08, 2010, 08:18:09 pm
I would bet money Andrew has edited things retroactively, except I can't prove anything because it was edited retroactively.
MIERDO MILLAS DE VIBORAS FURIOSAS PARA ESTRANGULARTE MUERTO

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #68 on: February 03, 2009, 09:57:47 pm »
Quote from: Duke 2.0 on February 03, 2009, 09:42:26 pm
Oh crap, we are going to base our new date system on Tom Cruises death.
PCE(Preater Cruisii Excessum) would at least have an universally acctepted positive connotation - the point in time when the world got beter.
Logged

Rilder

  • Bay Watcher
  • Rye Elder
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #69 on: February 04, 2009, 05:29:04 am »
Quote from: Wooty on February 03, 2009, 08:52:43 pm
We should use the Star Trek "stardate" system. Every day we make up a completely random number from 2000-80000 and that's today's date.

I had a lil program on a old computer that calculated the current stardate...  :P
Logged
Steam Profile
Youtube(Let's Plays), Occasional Streaming
Quote from: Puck on October 29, 2010, 08:08:05 am
It felt a bit like a movie in which two stoners try to steal a military helicopter

Alexhans

  • Bay Watcher
  • This is toodamn shortto write something meaningful
    • View Profile
    • Osteopatia y Neurotonia
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #70 on: February 04, 2009, 09:57:52 am »
Quote from: Strife26 on February 03, 2009, 09:44:58 pm
But he isn't dead yet.  ???

How are we supposed to get our dating system if he isn't dead? Unless, he is a zombie?


We can solve that! Im tired of his watch-this-because-it-features-me-and-my-sexy/crazy?-looks movies

Quote from: Wooty on February 03, 2009, 08:52:43 pm
We should use the Star Trek "stardate" system. Every day we make up a completely random number from 2000-80000 and that's today's date.

That would be a great excuse for me... I always keep writing the past year in the first 4 months of the new year.
Logged
“Eight years was awesome and I was famous and I was powerful" - George W. Bush.

t0mme

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #71 on: February 13, 2009, 03:19:16 am »
In archaeology we use BP and calBP (before present and calibrated before present). Which is obviously better.
Logged

chaoticag

  • Bay Watcher
  • All Natural Pengbean
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #72 on: February 13, 2009, 03:30:07 am »
I don't see how a before present system works any better than sticking to what we have right now. In all cases we are using an arbitrary event to base our time system, and there is no accuracy change in switching to this new system.
Logged

Mulch Diggums

  • Bay Watcher
  • "Hey urist! I think that cat is having a seizure!"
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #73 on: February 13, 2009, 03:30:58 am »
Quote from: Wooty on February 02, 2009, 11:24:52 pm
We've been talking about how it could offend people and how would you like to have to call it year of the Buddah 2009

Im not a budhist, but I wouldn't mind calling it Buddah 2009.. Its catchy
Logged
ooooo! Swamp wiskey! Yeah!!

Sergius

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: BC vs BCE
« Reply #74 on: February 13, 2009, 11:43:30 am »
I propose a three notation system: BT, T and AT
Before Today
Today
After Today

We don't even need no stinkin' numbers.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
« previous next »