Cheers, it's always nice to get feedback on suggestions and know that other people appreciated them.
BTW I just finshed off Junji Ito Collection, which was pretty enjoyable. However something someone here said got me thinking about horror, and the different types and how cultural expectations can shape what we expect from a genre. e.g. someone said they didn't get Junji Ito Collection because it didn't "scare" them, and that got me thinking about whether the intent was even that.
e.g. one type of "horror" is the type that defines its appeal as "shocking" the audience with jump-out-of your seat moments. It's all based around eliciting the emotion of "being scared", so this type of horror will have a lot of jump-scares and monster-in-the-closet moments, as well as fake-outs, since it's hard to maintain that level of jump-scares continuously.
Whereas Junjo Ito isn't really based around that at all. it's not Freddy vs Jason material. Junjo Ito's stuff is based on setting up ideas that are wrong and disturbing then letting them play out to their tragi-comical finales. Yeah, that verges on horror, but it's a different type of horror, more going for pervasive unnerving feeling, or a sense of things being wrong or incongruous. In that sense it might be more akin to something like the Twilight Zone than it is to western horror films. e.g. Ito's stuff is more a cerebral type of body-horror, than an "omg get out of that room" sort of visceral horror, although it can definitely elicit that feeling too.