Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[A_Fey_Dwarf]

And P.S. It's webadict. One d.

Sorry about that, I just copy/pasted it from how jackrabbit spelled it.

[webadict]

*Lies on the ground, just kind of... dead.*

I'll avenge your death. Dang. Now who shall argue with me in a debate? Why couldn't you have lived so we could've accused each other! Why didn't the bodyguard protect you! ...Unless you were the bodyguard.

And P.S. It's webadict. One d.

Sorry about that, I just copy/pasted it from how jackrabbit spelled it.

'Sokay. Just didn't want to be on the block with a weird name. What about the ones that don't argue? They seem to be backing off. Wouldn't that be logical for a Mafia member to do? Maybe we ought to consider the possibilities of the following people:

Gantolandon
Xenomorph
Strife26
Xotes

They don't tend to post anything for defense. Well, some of them do, but I don't really remember.

And if you really want, you can put my name up there, too. I don't mind debating on how I'm not Mafia.

My biggest concerns: Xotes and Gantolandon.

[WorkerDrone]

Hrmmm...

[inaluct]

Well, I've thought about it, and I think that makes sense. I mean, if you're in the mafia, you can just kill any opponents you might have without having to accuse them. A mafia member would probably post once or never, and try to sink out of sight. I'm probably missing something, but why are Xotes and Gantoladon above Xenomorph and Strife? I know that Xenomorph has posted at least once, but I'm not sure about Gantoladon and Xotes. Did they not post at all?

Anyway, I'm still not decided on my vote, but it's leaning towards one of those four now. Their relative silence is suspicious, and it seems like they might be trying to be forgotten.

[Xenomorph]

I'm aware that being quiet can be suspicious, but it isn't proof, or even admission, of guilt, by a long shot.

Or is it?  I guess it's a case of finding a balance.

[webadict]

I'm aware that being quiet can be suspicious, but it isn't proof, or even admission, of guilt, by a long shot.

Or is it?  I guess it's a case of finding a balance.

I'm not saying it's automatic guilt, but it does look suspicious.

I only ask you others to consider that maybe we are just attacking each other and NOT the Mafia... I might have to go after one of these other four...

And they were posted by order that they were on the first post.

Maybe we ought to have their defense. If they don't plan to talk, maybe they are guilty. Does anyone object?

[A_Fey_Dwarf]

Yeah lynch the inactives!!!

[webadict]

I change my vote to lynch Xotes!

[A_Fey_Dwarf]

I change my vote to Xotes

New table:
webadict:two
Xotes: two
A_Fey_Dwarf:one

[Jackrabbit]

My vote stays until someone does something more suspicious than webadict

[webadict]

My vote stays until someone does something more suspicious than webadict

What did I do that was suspicious?

[Jackrabbit]

I accuse webadict because he's using strange logic to accuse someone. Someone in the mafia wouldn't vote to kill Pandarsenic because they whacked him. Unless, of course, they were trying to cover there tracks. And since he accused A_Fey_Dwarf it would make sense he was trying to draw suspicion away from him.

[webadict]

That wasn't strange logic... It makes a fair amount of sense. Though, I suppose if the Mafia wanted to throw off their tracks, they'd kill someone like that.

Anyway, if we tie, no one dies!

[inaluct]

I vote to lynch Xotes. I didn't want to have to pick who dies. 

Besides, he might end up being the saint.

[Xenomorph]

Looks like my vote for A_Fey_Dwarf won't do much.

I change my vote to webadict.

I'd have picked Xotes, but... I don't know... there's something about webadict I don't like.