Yes... It does look like you are trying to shift the blame to me. You originally voted for Pandarsenic to be lynched on day 1 and then switched your vote. You did this because you knew that the hit on Pandarsenic would go ahead and that it would look suspicious if you were to blame him. So to shift the suspicion away from yourself you changed your vote to Mikko. You did this even though you knew it wouldn't affect the outcome of the lynching, you did it purely to make it look like you had nothing to do with Pandarsenic's coming murder.
Therefore I vote to lynch webaddict.
I did change my vote to Mikko. Sure, I understand why I might look suspicious. But, I was not the first to accuse Pandersenic. I was not the second, either. No, I was last. Sure, I did vote for him and switch, but that's bound to happen. It was the first turn, and nobody knew anything. And I did give reasoning behind both of my votes, in case anyone would like to check.
Besides, if I were in the Mafia, I'd have killed Gantolandon. It would've been inconspicuous, since he said not one word. Everyone would've been wondering who the heck it was. Nor would I have spoken first, since the first one to speak is always ganged up on. Think of that. I saw what happened to Banzayatc. Why would the guilty be the first to put their neck out on the line. They'd wait until everyone started pointed fingers and then start pointing at someone else.
I'm not in the Mafia. I am merely a voice of reason. Listen to it if you'd like or simply put me in a noose. I think, like Pandersenic, that the voices of reason will be the first to go. Has anyone else put up any good arguments for who should be lynched?
My change to Mikko? Yes, I wanted to try and tie the vote, but it's hard to get everyone to do the same, so I picked someone that was more suspicious than Pandersenic. He was giving rational arguments, and I figured he'd be innocent.
And P.S. It's webadict. One d.
Author
Topic: Mafia - The End (Read 39501 times)