The term 'socialist' is usually confused with 'welfare liberals', but the boundaries between them are a tad blurred. They do believe in 'postive rights' and social justice, which do involve welfare and supporting the poor. The only difference is that socialists hate capitalists and welfare liberals are okay with capitalism, just want to 'fix' its faults, but as I say, the boundaries between the two are blurred...
I stated that Nation of Islam is 'liberal' in that it does support social justice for African-Americans (if not gay marriage or abortion), and I view that as pretty important in liberalism. Not animal rights, which is one thing the LCS fights for.
And I mean Paul and Goldwater are pacifist in the sense they wouldn't commit terrorist activities to accomplish their goals. But then again, few people would...
***
And, er...
Few conservatives would support appointing anyone "King".
EDIT: Actually, forget it. Let me try a different tact. Like Kruniac, I prefer having more choices and having options to play as the 'other side'. Humor is alright, but this is also a insurgency 'simulation', and it's better to keep the simulation and play it via the CCS when it is being formed after the LCS' strikes (to accurately simulate the CCS' response if it wasn't controlled by the AI). I know it might be impractical, but I prefer to have it the CCS' control structure be different...the CCS is full of uncoordinated sympathizers, who hate the hippies but can't really get roused up to attack as often as the LCS...
while the LCS is composed of Elite Liberal terrorists, who are far more powerful than the CCS members...but once you actually find and kill off the terrorists, you win.
Sleepers
within the LCS...man, that would be grand.