Total mortality appears to be similar in vegetarians and comparable non-vegetarians...
Hence you can’t really make the comment that vegetarians are any healthier than non-vegetarians.
Well, but at least saying you're destined to die if you're a vegetarian is a wee bit far fetched, as being claimed in the post Vaftrudner replied to.
Anyway, all farms cause immense amounts of death and suffering. Ploughing is utter destruction of entire ecosystems for the purpose of replacing them with monocultures that offer horrible life conditions to the local animal life. Just think of it this way: for every slice of bread you eat, a vole had to starve to death. So, the only way to be truly environmentally friendly is to commit suicide.
Wildlife population is limited by the amount of food/resources available. If you take some of that away, there will be initial starvation, but then things come into an equilibrium and there are no more "voles starving" than before.. not mentioning the fact that you need more farms overall for meat production anyway.
I stopped eating bread after I realized it was made of ground up wheat fetuses.
Damn, that is signature material.
Not really. If you really think the treatment of animals is equivalent to the treatment to corn, then congratulations (do you?).
I've seen a documentary on TV once (reliable program). Somewhere in China, they would keep a large amount of alive cats (20?) in a closed bag, then toss the whole thing into boiling water. You could see the cats jump around frantically in the bag. Note that personally I don't care about the cuteness factor, so the point is not that it was cats and not some less cuddly animal.
So, equivalent to cooking corn or not?